Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36696113›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Variation in Use of Lung Cancer Targeted Therapies Across State Medicaid Programs, 2020-2021.

Thomas J Roberts, Aaron S Kesselheim, Jerry Avorn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health disparities in neurology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disparities in Neuro-Oncology.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas J RobertsProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aaron S KesselheimProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jerry AvornProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Training in Oncology Population Sciences (TOPS)T32CA092203 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Nancy L Keating, JENNIFER W MACK · 2018 to 2026
$3.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Targeted therapies for EGFR (OMIM 131550)- and ALK (OMIM 105590)-altered metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) substantially improve outcomes for some patients. However, use of these therapies is lower among Medicaid patients, and access to oncology care varies across state Medicaid programs. Evidence is lacking on how use of targeted therapies for metastatic NSCLC varies across state Medicaid programs. Objectives: To characterize state-level variation in the use of targeted therapies among Medicaid patients with metastatic NSCLC and to describe factors associated with this variation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Medicaid Drug Utilization Database from 2020 and 2021 and peer-reviewed data on NSCLC incidence, the prevalence of EGFR and ALK alterations, and expected treatment durations to estimate expected use of targeted therapies for EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC in 33 states. Exposures: State-specific Medicaid programs and state policies and characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the estimated proportion of person-time of Medicaid patients with EGFR- or ALK-altered NSCLC associated with receipt of targeted therapy in each state Medicaid program. Nested linear regression models examined associations between the observed variation and state policies and characteristics. Results: There were an estimated 3461 person-years in which EGFR- and ALK-targeted therapies were indicated in 2020 and 2021. During these years, only 2281 person-years of EGFR- and ALK-targeted therapies were dispensed to Medicaid patients, suggesting that an estimated 66% of Medicaid patients with EGFR- and ALK-altered metastatic disease received indicated targeted therapies across all states. Rates of targeted therapy use ranged from 18% in Arkansas to 113% in Massachusetts; 30 of 33 states (91%) had lower rates of targeted therapy use than expected. The observed variation across state Medicaid programs was associated with Medicaid policies, the density of oncologists, and state gross domestic product per capita. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that rates of targeted therapy use among Medicaid patients with EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC were lower than expected and varied across state Medicaid programs. State policies and characteristics were associated with the observed variation, indicating where interventions could improve access to treatment and outcomes for patients with NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCross-Sectional StudiesErbB ReceptorsHumansMedicaidAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID36696113
PMCPMC10187487
OpenAlexW4317951822

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.