Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36698416›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Diagnostic value of [

Xinfeng Lin, Yingjie Li, Shuailiang Wang, Yan Zhang, Xuetao Chen, Maomao Wei, Hua Zhu, Aiwen Wu, Zhi Yang, Xuejuan Wang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04750772 (Comparison of Positron Nuclide Labeled DOTA-FAPI PET and FDG PET Study in Colocrectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04750772 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of Positron Nuclide Labeled DOTA-FAPI PET and FDG PET Study in Colocrectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteRan2019 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsTumor, Solid, Positron-Emission Tomography, Colorectal CancerArms18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT, 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabelled FAPI Versus [International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Head-to-head comparison ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Early image acquisitionEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI)-Based Theranostics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. First Clinical Experience ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Added value of dual-phaseFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Gastroenterology report · 2024
    Article
  15. Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. FAP-targeted PET imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies: a comprehensive review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xinfeng LinKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Yingjie LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, Unit III, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Shuailiang WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Yan ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Xuetao ChenKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Maomao WeiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Hua ZhuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Aiwen WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, Unit III, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhi YangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Xuejuan WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
National Medical Products Administration · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [ Methods: This single-center preliminary clinical study (NCT04750772) was conducted at the Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and included 61 participants with CRC who underwent sequential evaluation through PET/CT with [ Results: Of all the participants, 21 were treatment naïve and 40 had been previously treated. In primary CRC lesions, the average TBRs of [ Conclusion: [

Indexed as

colorectal cancerfibroblast-activation proteinfibroblast-activation protein inhibitorinhibitorpositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID36698416
PMCPMC9869033
OpenAlexW4313909987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.