ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Effectiveness and safety of tumor-treating fields therapy for glioblastoma: A single-center study in a Chinese cohort.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of tumor treating fields on overall and progression-free survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields (TTF) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy only in the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Association of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy with survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Neuromodulation in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Tumor treating fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Selective antitumor activity of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) involving molecular factors in cancer cells and tumor microenvironment.Translational oncology · 2025Review
- Impact of alternating electric fields therapy for newly diagnosed WHO grade 4 astrocytoma on patient survival: a real-world propensity-score adjusted prospective multicenter study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Recent advances in Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy for glioblastoma.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Real-world experience with TTFields in glioma patients with emphasis on therapy usage.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Relation between tumor treating fields usage rate ≥75% for the first 3 months and progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade 4 gliomas.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Impact of tumor-treating fields on the survival of Japanese patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- An ambispective, observational real-world study of tumor-treating fields for treatment of Chinese patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent/progressive glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are a new therapeutic modality for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). However, studies on survival outcomes of TTFields are rarely reported in China. This study aimed to examine the clinical efficacy and safety of TTFields therapy for GBM in China. Methods: A total of 93 patients with newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) and recurrent GBM (rGBM) were included in our study retrospectively. They were divided into two groups based on whether they used TTFields. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were assessed. Results: Among the patients with ndGBM, there were 13 cases with TTFields and 39 cases with no TTFields. The median PFS was 15.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.5-24.1] months and 10.6 (95% CI: 5.4-15.8) months in the two groups, respectively, with Conclusion: TTFields therapy is a safe and effective treatment for ndGBM, especially in patients with STR. However, it may not improve survival in patients with rGBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.