Evidence mapPaperPMID 36700730Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2023

Thirty-Day Outcomes of Resolute Onyx Stent for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Comparison With Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial.

Farhan Siddiq, Ravi S Nunna, Jonathan M Beall, Inamullah Khan, Musharaf Khan, Wondwossen G Tekle, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Omar Tanweer, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Pascal M Jabbour and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Next-generation Onyx DES for elective intracranial atherosclerosis: A meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of Onyx FrontierInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Farhan SiddiqDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Ravi S NunnaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Jonathan M BeallMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Inamullah KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Musharaf KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-746
Wondwossen G TekleDepartment of Neurology, Valley Baptist-University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, Texas, USA.
Mohamad EzzeldinDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Houston, HCA Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Omar TanweerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jan-Karl BurkhardtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pascal M JabbourDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stavropoula I TjoumakarisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nabeel A HerialDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Adnan H SiddiquiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Ramesh GrandhiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Renee L MartinMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Adnan I QureshiZeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute and Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Ameer E HassanDepartment of Neurology, Valley Baptist-University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, Texas, USA.
University of Missouri · USThomas Jefferson University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USValley Baptist Medical Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USRehabilitation Institute of Kansas City · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD) is estimated to cause 10% of strokes annually in the United States. However, treatment remains a challenge with several different stenting options studied in the past with unfavorable results.

objectiveTo report the 30-day stroke and/or death rate associated with intracranial stent placement for sICAD using Resolute Onyx Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent (RO-ZES) and provide a comparison with the results of Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial.

methodsProspectively maintained databases across 8 stroke centers were used to identify adult patients treated with RO-ZES for sICAD between January 2019 and December 2021. Primary end point was composite of 30-day stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and/or death. Propensity score matching was performed using age, hypertension, lipid disorder, cigarette smoking, and symptomatic target vessel to create a matched group for comparison between RO-ZES and the SAMMPRIS medical management and treatment groups (SAMMPRIS percutaneous angioplasty and stenting [S-PTAS]).

resultsA total of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis (mean age: 64.2 years). Mean severity of stenosis was 81.4% (±11.4%). A total of 4 (3.03%) stroke and/or deaths were reported within 30 days of treatment in the RO-ZES group compared with 6.6% in the SAMMPRIS medical management group (OR [odds ratio] 2.26, 95% CI 0.7-9.56, P = .22) and 15.6% in the S-PTAS group (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.04-23.4, P < .001). Propensity score match analysis of 115 patients in each group demonstrated 30-day stroke and/or death rate of 2.6% in the RO-ZES group and 15.6% in the S-PTAS group (OR 6.88, 95% CI 1.92-37.54, P < .001).

conclusionPatients treated with RO-ZES had a relatively low 30-day stroke and/or death rate compared with the S-PTAS group. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RO-ZES for the treatment of sICAD.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsStrokeAdultCerebral InfarctionConstriction, PathologicHumansMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreStentsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36700730
PMCPMC10553131
OpenAlexW4318069608

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.