Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708552›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as a Poor Predictive Biomarker for Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Kambiz Novin, Pedram Fadavi, Nafiseh Mortazavi, Mastaneh Sanei, Helaleh Khoshbakht Ahmadi, Maedeh Barahman, Reyhaneh Noori, Soodabeh Hoveidamanesh, Mohadeseh Shahin, Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kambiz NovinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7524-5887
Pedram FadaviDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7491-2561
Nafiseh MortazaviDepartment of Pathology, Iran University of Medical science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4432-8783
Mastaneh SaneiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4488-3998
Helaleh Khoshbakht AhmadiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1392-3213
Maedeh BarahmanFiroozgar Clinical Research Development Center(FCRDC), Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0660-0069
Reyhaneh NooriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2086-2030
Soodabeh HoveidamaneshBurn Research Center, Iran University of Medical science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8617-8736
Mohadeseh ShahinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad Taghizadeh-HesaryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-2203
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe literature is inconsistent for the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) obtained before neoadjuvant therapy (pre-NLR) in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (neoCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In the present cohort study, we explored the predictive role of pre-NLR in this setting.

methodsWe prospectively included patients with LARC who were candidates for neoCRT at the Shohada-e-Hafte Tir Hospital (Tehran, Iran) between Mar 2018 and Feb 2020. The pre-NLR was obtained through a peripheral blood smear before CRT. We used the AJCC system for evaluating tumor regression grade (TRG). The TRGs were categorized into: response-group 1 (TRG 0-1 vs. 2-3), response-group 2 (TRG 0 vs. 1-3), and response-group 3 (TRG 0-2 vs. 3). We applied receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess the predictive value of pre-NLR.

resultsOf the 86 screened patients with rectal cancer, 30   patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. In total, 63.3% were responsive, and 23.3% had complete pathologic response. Pre-NLR could not predict the pathologic response in response-group 1 (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.45, 95%CI 0.23-0.66) and response-group 2 (AUC: 0.36, 95%CI 0.13-0.59). Nevertheless, it had a poor predictive value in response-group 3 (AUC: 0.55, CI%95 0.33-0.75) with an optimal NLR cutoff value of 2.94.

conclusionsPre-NLR could not predict the pathological response to neoCRT in our cohort of patients with LARC.

Indexed as

NeutrophilsRectal NeoplasmsBiomarkersChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesHumansIranLymphocytesNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersneoadjuvant therapyneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPathologic responserectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36708552
PMCPMC10152857
OpenAlexW4318387552

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.