Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36709261›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

DeepSelectNet: deep neural network based selective sequencing for oxford nanopore sequencing.

Anjana Senanayake, Hasindu Gamaarachchi, Damayanthi Herath, Roshan Ragel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review: Long-Read Sequencing in Algal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Accelerated nanopore basecalling with SLOW5 data format.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anjana SenanayakeDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. anjana.senanayake@eng.pdn.ac.lk.
Hasindu GamaarachchiKinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Damayanthi HerathDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Roshan RagelDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
University of Peradeniya · LKUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNanopore sequencing allows selective sequencing, the ability to programmatically reject unwanted reads in a sample. Selective sequencing has many present and future applications in genomics research and the classification of species from a pool of species is an example. Existing methods for selective sequencing for species classification are still immature and the accuracy highly varies depending on the datasets. For the five datasets we tested, the accuracy of existing methods varied in the range of [Formula: see text] 77 to 97% (average accuracy < 89%). Here we present DeepSelectNet, an accurate deep-learning-based method that can directly classify nanopore current signals belonging to a particular species. DeepSelectNet utilizes novel data preprocessing techniques and improved neural network architecture for regularization.

resultsFor the five datasets tested, DeepSelectNet's accuracy varied between [Formula: see text] 91 and 99% (average accuracy [Formula: see text] 95%). At its best performance, DeepSelectNet achieved a nearly 12% accuracy increase compared to its deep learning-based predecessor SquiggleNet. Furthermore, precision and recall evaluated for DeepSelectNet on average were always > 89% (average [Formula: see text] 95%). In terms of execution performance, DeepSelectNet outperformed SquiggleNet by [Formula: see text] 13% on average. Thus, DeepSelectNet is a practically viable method to improve the effectiveness of selective sequencing.

conclusionsCompared to base alignment and deep learning predecessors, DeepSelectNet can significantly improve the accuracy to enable real-time species classification using selective sequencing. The source code of DeepSelectNet is available at https://github.com/AnjanaSenanayake/DeepSelectNet .

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareDeep learningNanoporeSelective sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36709261
PMCPMC9883605
OpenAlexW4318408334

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.