Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711499›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Covid-19 affects taste independently of smell: results from a combined chemosensory home test and online survey from a global cohort (N=10,953).

Ha Nguyen, Javier Albayay, Richard Höchenberger, Surabhi Bhutani, Sanne Boesveldt, Niko A Busch, Ilja Croijmans, Keiland W Cooper, Jasper H B de Groot, Michael C Farruggia and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 9 countries.

Ha NguyenMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Javier AlbayayUniversità degli Studi di Trento, Centro Interdipartimentale Mente/Cervello, Rovereto, IT.
Richard HöchenbergerUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, France, MIND, Palaiseau, FR.
Surabhi BhutaniSan Diego State University, School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sanne BoesveldtWageningen University, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, NL.
Niko A BuschUniversity of Münster, Institute for Psychology, Münster, DE.
Ilja CroijmansRadboud University, Language and communication, Nijmegen, Gelderland, NL.
Keiland W CooperUniversity of California Irvine, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jasper H B de GrootRadboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, Gelderland, NL.
Michael C FarruggiaYale University School of Medicine, Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA.
Alexander W FjaeldstadGødstrup Regional Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Flavour Clinic, University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep, Herning, DK.
John E HayesThe Pennsylvania State University, Department of Food Science, University Park, PA, USA.
Thomas HummelUniversity of Dresden Medical School, Smell & Taste Clinic, Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Dresden, DE.
Paule V JosephPaule Joseph, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, DIBCR, Section of Sensory Science and Metabolism, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tatiana K LaktionovaTatiana K. Laktionova, A N Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Moscow, RU.
Thierry Thomas-DanguinThierry Thomas-Danguin, INRAE CSGA, Research Center for Smell Taste and Feeding Behavior, Dijon, FR.
Maria G VeldhuizenMaria Veldhuizen, Mersin Universitesi, Anatomy, Mersin, TR.
Vera V VoznessenskayaTatiana K. Laktionova, A N Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Moscow, RU.
Valentina ParmaMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M Yanina PepinoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Division of Nutritional Sciences, and Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, IL, USA.
Kathrin OhlaThe Pennsylvania State University, Department of Food Science, University Park, PA, USA.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USPennsylvania State University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution · RUAarhus University · DKÉcole Polytechnique · FRMersin Üniversitesi · TRNational Institutes of Health · USSan Diego State University · USTaste and Smell Clinic · USUniversité de Bourgogne · FRUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Münster · DEUniversity of Trento · ITWageningen University & Research · NLYale University · US

Funding

Sensory Science and Metabolism; Molecular and Neuronal MechanismsZIANR000035 · NINR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH · PI JOSEPH, PAULE · 2018 to 2020
$1.7M
Rapid olfactory tools for telemedicine-friendly COVID-19 screening and surveillanceU01DC019573 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GERKIN, RICHARD C, HAYES, JOHN EDWARD · 2021 to 2021
$901k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NR000035NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC019573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People often confuse smell loss with taste loss, so it is unclear how much gustatory function is reduced in patients self-reporting taste loss. Our pre-registered cross-sectional study design included an online survey in 12 languages with instructions for self-administering chemosensory tests with ten household items. Between June 2020 and March 2021, 10,953 individuals participated. Of these, 3,356 self-reported a positive and 602 a negative COVID-19 diagnosis (COVID+ and COVID-, respectively); 1,267 were awaiting test results (COVID?). The rest reported no respiratory illness and were grouped by symptoms: sudden smell/taste changes (STC, N=4,445), other symptoms excluding smell or taste loss (OthS, N=832), and no symptoms (NoS, N=416). Taste, smell, and oral irritation intensities and self-assessed abilities were rated on visual analog scales. Compared to the NoS group, COVID+ was associated with a 21% reduction in taste (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 15-28%), 47% in smell (95%-CI: 37-56%), and 17% in oral irritation (95%-CI: 10-25%) intensity. In all groups, perceived intensity of smell (r=0.84), taste (r=0.68), and oral irritation (r=0.37) was correlated. Our findings suggest most reports of taste dysfunction with COVID-19 were genuine and not due to misinterpreting smell loss as taste loss (i.e., a classical taste-flavor confusion). Assessing smell and taste intensity of household items is a promising, cost-effective screening tool that complements self-reports and helps to disentangle taste loss from smell loss. However, it does not replace standardized validated psychophysical tests.

Identifiers

PMID36711499
PMCPMC9882440
OpenAlexW4318157572

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.