Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713460›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Research progress on circular RNA vaccines.

Yu Bai, Dong Liu, Qian He, Jianyang Liu, Qunying Mao, Zhenglun Liang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. RNA vaccines: The dawn of a new age for tuberculosis?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  8. The strategies and advances of mRNA translation booster.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Promising Vaccine Formulations for Emerging Infectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu BaiDivision of Hepatitis and Enterovirus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Dong LiuDivision of Hepatitis and Enterovirus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Qian HeDivision of Hepatitis and Enterovirus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Jianyang LiuDivision of Hepatitis and Enterovirus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Qunying MaoDivision of Hepatitis and Enterovirus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Zhenglun LiangDivision of Hepatitis and Enterovirus Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
National Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the success of linear mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, biopharmaceutical companies and research teams worldwide have attempted to develop more stable circular RNA (circRNA) vaccines and have achieved some preliminary results. This review aims to summarize key findings and important progress made in circRNA research, the

Indexed as

Biological ProductsCOVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansRNA, CircularRNA, MessengerBiological ProductsCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, CircularRNA, MessengerVaccinescircular RNA vaccinesoutlookproduction processquality controlresearch progress

Identifiers

PMID36713460
PMCPMC9878156
OpenAlexW4315640782

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.