Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36715073›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2023

The utilization of systematic review evidence in formulating India's National Health Programme guidelines between 2007 and 2021.

Eti Rajwar, Prachi Pundir, Shradha S Parsekar, Anupama D S, Sonia R B D'Souza, Baby S Nayak, Judith Angelitta Noronha, Preethy D'Souza, Sandy Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Scoping the Scope for Scoping Reviews in Public Health in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eti RajwarPublic Health Evidence South Asia, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8339-218X
Prachi PundirPublic Health Evidence South Asia, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-7611
Shradha S ParsekarDepartment of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Anupama D SDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Sonia R B D'SouzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Baby S NayakDepartment of Child Health Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Judith Angelitta NoronhaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Preethy D'SouzaEPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 10 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK.
Sandy OliverEPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 10 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-269X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-informed policymaking integrates the best available evidence on programme outcomes to guide decisions at all stages of the policy process and its importance becomes more pronounced in resource-constrained settings. In this paper, we have reviewed the use of systematic review evidence in framing National Health Programme (NHP) guidelines in India. We searched official websites of the different NHPs, linked to the main website of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), in December 2020 and January 2021. NHP guideline documents with systematic review evidence were identified and information on the use of this evidence was extracted. We classified the identified systematic review evidence according to its use in the guideline documents and analysed the data to provide information on the different factors and patterns linked to the use of systematic review evidence in these documents. Systematic reviews were mostly visible in guideline documents addressing maternal and newborn health, communicable diseases and immunization. These systematic reviews were cited in the guidelines to justify the need for action, to justify recommendations for action and opportunities for local adaptation, and to highlight implementation challenges and justify implementation strategies. Guideline documents addressing implementation cited systematic reviews about the problems and policy options more often than citing systematic reviews about implementation. Systematic reviews were linked directly to support statements in few guideline documents, and sometimes the reviews were not appropriately cited. Most of the systematic reviews providing information on the nature and scale of the policy problem included Indian data. It was seen that since 2014, India has been increasingly using systematic review evidence for public health policymaking, particularly for some of its high-priority NHPs. This complements the increasing investment in research synthesis centres and procedures to support evidence-informed decision making, demonstrating the continued evolution of India's evidence policy system.

Indexed as

National Health ProgramsPolicy MakingGuidelines as TopicHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornSystematic Reviews as Topicevidence-informed policymakingEvidence synthesisIndianational health programmespolicymakingpublic health

Identifiers

PMID36715073
PMCPMC10089070

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.