Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36715337›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Genome-wide mapping of protein-DNA damage interaction by PADD-seq.

Yongchang Zhu, Yuanqing Tan, Lin Li, Yuening Xiang, Yanchao Huang, Xiping Zhang, Jiayong Yin, Jie Li, Fei Lan, Maoxiang Qian and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yongchang ZhuShanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yuanqing TanShanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Lin LiInstitute of Pediatrics and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yuening XiangInstitute of Pediatrics and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yanchao HuangShanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiping ZhangShanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jiayong YinInstitute of Pediatrics and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jie LiShanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Fei LanShanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism, Ministry of Science and Technology, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Ministry of Education, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Maoxiang QianInstitute of Pediatrics and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2889-546X
Jinchuan HuShanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7096-0195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-DNA damage interactions are critical for understanding the mechanism of DNA repair and damage response. However, due to the relatively random distributions of UV-induced damage and other DNA bulky adducts, it is challenging to measure the interactions between proteins and these lesions across the genome. To address this issue, we developed a new method named Protein-Associated DNA Damage Sequencing (PADD-seq) that uses Damage-seq to detect damage distribution in chromatin immunoprecipitation-enriched DNA fragments. It is possible to delineate genome-wide protein-DNA damage interactions at base resolution with this strategy. Using PADD-seq, we observed that RNA polymerase II (Pol II) was blocked by UV-induced damage on template strands, and the interaction declined within 2 h in transcription-coupled repair-proficient cells. On the other hand, Pol II was clearly restrained at damage sites in the absence of the transcription-repair coupling factor CSB during the same time course. Furthermore, we used PADD-seq to examine local changes in H3 acetylation at lysine 9 (H3K9ac) around cisplatin-induced damage, demonstrating the method's broad utility. In conclusion, this new method provides a powerful tool for monitoring the dynamics of protein-DNA damage interaction at the genomic level, and it encourages comprehensive research into DNA repair and damage response.

Indexed as

DNA DamageGenetic TechniquesChromosome MappingDNADNA AdductsDNA RepairTranscription FactorsDNADNA AdductsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID36715337
PMCPMC10085696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.