Evidence mapPaperPMID 36715770Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Prevalence of venous loops and association with retinal ischemia in diabetic retinopathy using widefield swept-source OCT angiography.

Rongrong Le, Ying Cui, Edward S Lu, Ying Zhu, Itika Garg, Jay C Wang, Yifan Lu, Rebecca Zeng, Raviv Katz, Inês Laíns and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rongrong Le *Harvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Ying Cui *Harvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Edward S LuHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Ying ZhuHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Itika GargHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Jay C WangHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Yifan LuHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca ZengHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Raviv KatzHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Inês LaínsHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA.
Dean EliottRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Deeba HusainRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Leo A KimRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
John B MillerHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Boston, MA, USA. john_miller@meei.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-9738
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USCentral South University · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Lions Clubs International Foundation 530869Lions Clubs International Foundation Grant numbers 530125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of diabetic patients with retinal venous loops (RVLs) and to assess the association with retinal ischemia using widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (WF SS-OCTA).

methodsIn this retrospective, cross-sectional study, a total of 195 eyes of 132 diabetic patients (31 eyes with no diabetic retinopathy (DR), 76 eyes with nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and 88 eyes with proliferative DR (PDR)) were imaged with WF SS-OCTA using Angio 6 × 6 mm and Montage 15 × 15 mm scans. Quantitative ischemia-related parameters, including ischemia index (ratio of nonperfusion area to total retinal area), foveal avascular zone (FAZ), and neovascularization features, were evaluated. RVLs were classified as type I or type II according to the branching level of the feeder vessel. A multivariate generalized estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression model was used to analyze the association of systemic parameters and ischemia-related metrics with RVLs in PDR eyes.

resultsForty-eight RVLs were identified in 22 eyes (11.28%). The prevalence of RVLs was higher in PDR compared to NPDR eyes (21.59% vs. 3.95%, P < 0.05). Type II RVLs accounted for a higher proportion than type I (89.58% vs. 10.42%, P < 0.001). RVLs were more likely to originate from superior (vs. inferior) and temporal (vs. nasal) veins (P < 0.05). The GEE model showed that neovascularization (NV) flow area and diastolic blood pressure were associated with RVLs in the PDR group (P < 0.05).

conclusionWF SS-OCTA is useful for the identification of RVLs in patients with DR. NV flow area and diastolic blood pressure were associated with the presence of RVLs in eyes with PDR. Ischemia index, FAZ, and other WF SS-OCTA parameters were not associated with RVLs. Further longitudinal studies are needed to identify the role of RVLs in DR progression.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyCross-Sectional StudiesFluorescein AngiographyHumansIschemiaNeovascularization, PathologicPrevalenceRetinal VesselsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceDiabetic retinopathyNonperfusion areaRetinal venous loopsWidefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography

Identifiers

PMID36715770
OpenAlexW4318478538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.