Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36716415›Full record

Trial reportJCO precision oncology2023

Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations to Predict Olaparib Plus Bevacizumab Efficacy in the First-Line Ovarian Cancer PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 Trial.

Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Jessica Brown, Alan Barnicle, Jonathan Wessen, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Steven W Criscione, Andreas du Bois, Domenica Lorusso, Ignacio Romero, Edgar Petru and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCO precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 9 countries.

Eric Pujade-LauraineARCAGY-GINECO, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0759-7263
Jessica BrownAstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alan BarnicleAstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jonathan WessenAstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Pierre Lao-SirieixAstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Steven W CriscioneAstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6550-5769
Andreas du BoisEvang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen and AGO, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8477-506X
Domenica LorussoFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan and MITO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0981-0598
Ignacio RomeroInstituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia and GEICO, Spain.
Edgar PetruUniversitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med, Universität Graz, Graz and AGO, Austria.
Hiroyuki YoshidaSaitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama and GOTIC, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0618-3800
Ignace VergoteUniversity Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven and BGOG, Belgium.
Nicoletta ColomboUniversity of Milan-Bicocca and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan and MANGO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2225-715X
Sakari HietanenTurku University Hospital, Turku and NSGO, Finland.
Magali ProvansalInstitut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille and GINECO, France.
Barbara SchmalfeldtUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg and AGO, Germany.
Sandro PignataIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples and MITO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8836-2633
Cristina Martín LorenteHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona and GEICO, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9827-0521
Dominique BertonL'Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Center René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain and GINECO, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6182-6998
Ingo B RunnebaumJena University Hospital, Universitaets-Frauenklinik Jena and AGO, Germany.
Isabelle Ray-CoquardCenter Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon and GINECO, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2472-8306
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBArcagy Gineco · FRFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEKU Leuven · BEOlgahospital · DESaitama International Medical Center · JPTurku University Hospital · FIUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe · ATUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial of maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab for newly diagnosed advanced high-grade ovarian cancer demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over placebo plus bevacizumab, particularly in patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumors. We explored whether mutations in non-

methodsEight hundred and six patients were randomly assigned (2:1). Tumors were analyzed using the Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus assay to assess non-BRCA HRRm and HRD status; HRD was based on a genomic instability score (GIS) of ≥ 42. In this exploratory analysis, PFS was assessed in patients harboring deleterious mutations using six non-BRCA HRR gene panels, three devised for this analysis and three previously published.

resultsThe non-BRCA HRRm prevalence ranged from 30 of 806 (3.7%) to 79 of 806 (9.8%) depending on the gene panel used, whereas 152 of 806 (18.9%) had non-

conclusionAcknowledging limitations of small subgroup sizes, non-BRCA HRRm gene panels were not predictive of PFS benefit with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in PAOLA-1, irrespective of the gene panel tested. Current gene panels exploring HRRm should not be considered a substitute for HRD determined by BRCA mutation status and genomic instability testing in first-line high-grade ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsRecombinational DNA RepairBevacizumabFemaleGenomic InstabilityHumansMutationPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBevacizumabolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36716415
PMCPMC9928987
OpenAlexW4318575269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.