Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36716995›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2023

Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies to Monoclonal Antibodies in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ming-Li Chen, Tanawin Nopsopon, Ayobami Akenroye

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Understanding Biologics in CRSwNP: Related Events and Insights.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biologics in severe asthma: a state-of-the-art review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current Challenges in Pediatric Asthma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ming-Li ChenHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tanawin NopsoponDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ayobami AkenroyeDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md. Electronic address: aakenroye@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Synthesizing Trial and Real-world Data on the Use of Biologics in Patients with Severe AsthmaR00MD015767 · NIMHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI AKENROYE, AYOBAMI T · 2023 to 2025
$677k
NIMHD NIH HHS R00 MD015767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntidrug antibodies (ADAs) may worsen the efficacy and safety of biologics. However, little is known about the incidence of ADAs associated with the 6 biologics approved for the treatment of asthma in the United States.

objectiveTo elucidate the incidence of ADAs and their impact on reported clinical outcomes.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, open-label extension studies, and nonrandomized studies of biologics in patients with asthma indexed in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL between January 1, 2000, and July 9, 2022, were carried out. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent ADAs (incidence) and ADA prevalence.

resultsA total of 46 studies met the eligibility criteria. ADA incidence over follow-up was 2.91% (95% CI, 1.60-4.55) and was highest in the benralizumab studies (8.35%), with a risk ratio of 4.9 (2.69-8.92) when compared with placebo, and lowest in the omalizumab studies (0.00%). Incidence was 7.61% in the dupilumab studies, 4.39% in reslizumab, 3.63% in mepolizumab, and 1.12% in the tezepelumab studies. Incidence of neutralizing antibodies was 0.00% to 10.74% and was highest for benralizumab (7.12%). Incidence of neutralizing antibodies was higher in the benralizumab every 8 weeks (8.17%) versus every 4 weeks arms (5.81%). Results were consistent in subgroup analyses by study type and length of follow-up.

conclusionsApproximately 2.9% of individuals in the included studies developed ADAs over study follow-up period. The incidence was highest in the benralizumab group and lowest in the omalizumab group. The subcutaneous route and longer dosing intervals were associated with higher ADA development.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBiological ProductsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingHumansIncidenceOmalizumabAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingBiological ProductsOmalizumabAntidrug antibodiesAsthmaBiologicsImmunogenicitymAbs

Identifiers

PMID36716995
PMCPMC10601343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.