Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717818›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Exploring barriers to dementia screening and management services by general practitioners in China: a qualitative study using the COM-B model.

Ni Gong, Dan Yang, Jianfeng Zou, Qianyu He, Lei Hu, Weiju Chen, Jing Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ni Gong *School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China.
Dan Yang *School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China.
Jianfeng ZouDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou , Guangdong, 510080, China.
Qianyu HeDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou , Guangdong, 510080, China.
Lei HuSchool of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China.
Weiju ChenSchool of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China. weijuchen2008@163.com.
Jing LiaoDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou , Guangdong, 510080, China. liaojing5@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Jinan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 72061137003the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 202201011288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia has become a global public health problem, and general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in diagnosing and managing dementia. However, in Chinese primary care settings, dementia is underdiagnosed and inefficiently managed, and dementia screening and management services provided by GPs are suboptimal. The reasons underlying this gap are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the barriers that hinder GPs from actively promoting dementia screening and management, and thereby provide insights for the successful promotion of dementia screening and management services in primary care.

methodsPurposive sampling was used. And focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face among GPs from community health service centers (CHSCs) in South China. Thematic analysis was used to identify barriers to screening and managing dementia and map them to the Capability/Opportunity/Motivation-Behavior model (COM-B model).

resultsFifty-two GPs were included. The COM-B model found nine barriers to implementing dementia screening and management services in primary healthcare: (1) poor capability: lack of systematic knowledge of dementia and inadequate dementia screening skills; (2) little opportunity: unclear pathways for referral, insufficient time for dementia screening and management, lack of dementia-specific leaders, and no guarantee of services continuity; (3) low motivation: outside of GP scope, worries associated with dementia stigma rooted in culture beliefs, and insufficient financial incentives.

conclusionsOur study concluded that GPs were not yet ready to provide dementia screening and management services due to poor capability related to knowledge and skills of dementia, little opportunity associated with an unsupportive working environment, and low motivation due to unclear duty and social pressure. Accordingly, systematic implementation strategies should be taken, including standardized dementia training programs, standardized community-based dementia guidelines, expansion of primary care workforces, development of dedicated leaders, and the eradication of stigma attached to dementia to promote dementia screening and management services in primary care.

Indexed as

DementiaGeneral PractitionersFocus GroupsHumansMotivationQualitative ResearchCapability/Opportunity/Motivation-Behavior modelDementia screening and managementGeneral practitioner

Identifiers

PMID36717818
PMCPMC9886538
OpenAlexW4318567986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.