ArticleJournal of translational autoimmunity2023
Autoantibodies to dsDNA in the diagnosis, classification and follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Checkpoint-enriched T cells with retained effector-associated features are associated with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Glycosylation of anti-dsDNA IgG correlates with organ involvement in treatment-naïve patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Article
- Mechanistic Evaluation of Anti-CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy Repurposed in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Lupus Nephritis Risk Factors and Biomarkers: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA antibodies, are increasingly used for diagnosis, classification and follow-up of patients with SLE. Since standardization of autoantibody assays is a major challenge, more attention should be paid to harmonization initiatives and better definition of required test characteristics in classification criteria. For diagnosis and follow-up separate multi-center studies are required to establish test characteristics of distinct immuno-assays for both purposes. Finally, such studies should consider not to evaluate SLE as a single disease, but as a disease with distinct subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.