Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36718935›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Revealing determinants of translation efficiency via whole-gene codon randomization and machine learning.

Thijs Nieuwkoop, Barbara R Terlouw, Katherine G Stevens, Richard A Scheltema, Dick de Ridder, John van der Oost, Nico J Claassens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A statistical-physics approach for codon usage optimisation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thijs NieuwkoopLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, The Netherlands.
Barbara R TerlouwBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.
Katherine G StevensBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Richard A ScheltemaBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-0253
Dick de RidderBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-4310
John van der OostLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5024-1871
Nico J ClaassensLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1593-0377
Wageningen University & Research · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been known for decades that codon usage contributes to translation efficiency and hence to protein production levels. However, its role in protein synthesis is still only partly understood. This lack of understanding hampers the design of synthetic genes for efficient protein production. In this study, we generated a synonymous codon-randomized library of the complete coding sequence of red fluorescent protein. Protein production levels and the full coding sequences were determined for 1459 gene variants in Escherichia coli. Using different machine learning approaches, these data were used to reveal correlations between codon usage and protein production. Interestingly, protein production levels can be relatively accurately predicted (Pearson correlation of 0.762) by a Random Forest model that only relies on the sequence information of the first eight codons. In this region, close to the translation initiation site, mRNA secondary structure rather than Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) is the key determinant of protein production. This study clearly demonstrates the key role of codons at the start of the coding sequence. Furthermore, these results imply that commonly used CAI-based codon optimization of the full coding sequence is not a very effective strategy. One should rather focus on optimizing protein production via reducing mRNA secondary structure formation with the first few codons.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliMachine LearningCodonProtein BiosynthesisRandom AllocationRNA, MessengerCodonRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID36718935
PMCPMC10018363
OpenAlexW4318669939

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.