Evidence mapPaperPMID 36719713Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Prediction of Next Glucose Measurement in Hospitalized Patients by Comparing Various Regression Methods: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Andrew D Zale, Mohammed S Abusamaan, John McGready, Nestoras Mathioudakis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Medications that Regulate Gastrointestinal Transit Influence Inpatient Blood Glucose.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew D ZaleDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-0924
Mohammed S AbusamaanDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9307-1315
John McGreadyDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-9167
Nestoras MathioudakisDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0210-655X
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK111986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous glucose monitors have shown great promise in improving outpatient blood glucose (BG) control; however, continuous glucose monitors are not routinely used in hospitals, and glucose management is driven by point-of-care (finger stick) and serum glucose measurements in most patients.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate times series approaches for prediction of inpatient BG using only point-of-care and serum glucose observations.

methodsOur data set included electronic health record data from 184,320 admissions, from patients who received at least one unit of subcutaneous insulin, had at least 4 BG measurements, and were discharged between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2019, from 5 Johns Hopkins Health System hospitals. A total of 2,436,228 BG observations were included after excluding measurements obtained in quick succession, from patients who received intravenous insulin, or from critically ill patients. After exclusion criteria, 2.85% (3253/113,976), 32.5% (37,045/113,976), and 1.06% (1207/113,976) of admissions had a coded diagnosis of type 1, type 2, and other diabetes, respectively. The outcome of interest was the predicted value of the next BG measurement (mg/dL). Multiple time series predictors were created and analyzed by comparing those predictors and the index BG measurement (sample-and-hold technique) with next BG measurement. The population was classified by glycemic variability based on the coefficient of variation. To compare the performance of different time series predictors among one another, R

resultsThe median number of BG measurements from 113,976 admissions was 12 (IQR 5-24). The R

conclusionsWhen analyzing time series predictors independently, increasing variability in a patient's BG decreased predictive accuracy. Similarly, inclusion of older BG measurements decreased predictive accuracy. These relationships become weaker as glucose variability increases. Machine learning techniques marginally augmented the performance of time series predictors for predicting a patient's next BG measurement. Further studies should determine the potential of using time series analyses for prediction of inpatient dysglycemia.

Indexed as

glucosehospitalinpatientmachine learningpredictionregression

Identifiers

PMID36719713
PMCPMC9929733
OpenAlexW4312376281

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.