Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720825›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Measuring Cellular Ploidy In Situ by Light Microscopy.

Delisa E Clay, Benjamin M Stormo, Donald T Fox

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Delisa E ClayDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Benjamin M StormoDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Donald T FoxDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. don.fox@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-179X
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
Polyploidy after tissue injury: a Drosophila modelR01GM118447 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOX, DONALD T. · 2016 to 2025
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining cellular DNA content is valuable in the study of numerous biological processes, including organ development and injury repair. While FACS analysis of dissociated cells is a widely used method for assaying ploidy in a tissue cell population, for many tissue samples, it is possible and convenient to measure ploidy in situ using light microscopy. Here, we present two protocols for measuring cellular ploidy in tissues. These protocols are based on our studies in Drosophila melanogaster, but these are applicable to other settings as well. We present example results from Drosophila hindgut, midgut, and wing imaginal disc as examples. The first protocol focuses on measuring DNA content from decondensed interphase nuclei, while the second protocol details the visualization of condensed chromosomes for ploidy determination, either from mitotic cells or from interphase cells with drug-induced chromosome condensation. These techniques can be completed in 1 day and require standard lab supplies as well as a fluorescence light microscope.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterMicroscopyAnimalsCell NucleusDNADrosophilaPloidiesDNACellular ploidyMicroscopyPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID36720825
PMCPMC10446886
OpenAlexW4318755004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.