ArticleScientific reports2023
Explainable artificial intelligence as a reliable annotator of archaeal promoter regions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of archaeal promoters using explainable and web-based CNN model.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Harnessing promoter elements to enhance gene editing in plants: perspectives and advances.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Current methods in explainable artificial intelligence and future prospects for integrative physiology.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Predicting bacterial transcription factor binding sites through machine learning and structural characterization based on DNA duplex stability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A promoter-RBS library for fine-tuning gene expression inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- CDBProm: the Comprehensive Directory of Bacterial Promoters.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Convergence in Mobility Data Sets From Apple, Google, and Meta.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Archaea are a vast and unexplored cellular domain that thrive in a high diversity of environments, having central roles in processes mediating global carbon and nutrient fluxes. For these organisms to balance their metabolism, the appropriate regulation of their gene expression is essential. A key momentum in regulating genes responsible for the life maintenance of archaea is when transcription factor proteins bind to the promoter element. This DNA segment is conserved, which enables its exploration by machine learning techniques. Here, we trained and tested a support vector machine with 3935 known archaeal promoter sequences. All promoter sequences were coded into DNA Duplex Stability. After, we performed a model interpretation task to map the decision pattern of the classification procedure. We also used a dataset of known-promoter sequences for validation. Our results showed that an AT rich region around position - 27 upstream (relative to the start TSS) is the most conserved in the analyzed organisms. In addition, we were able to identify the BRE element (- 33), the PPE (at - 10) and a position at + 3, that provides a more understandable picture of how promoters are organized in all the archaeal organisms. Finally, we used the interpreted model to identify potential promoter sequences of 135 unannotated organisms, delivering regulatory regions annotation of archaea in a scale never accomplished before ( https://pcyt.unam.mx/gene-regulation/ ). We consider that this approach will be useful to understand how gene regulation is achieved in other organisms apart from the already established transcription factor binding sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.