Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36723606›Full record

SynthesisNeuro-oncology2023

Application of radiomics to meningiomas: A systematic review.

Ruchit V Patel, Shun Yao, Raymond Y Huang, Wenya Linda Bi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Meningioma recurrence: Time for an online prediction tool?Surgical neurology international · 2024
    Review
  17. Applications and Integration of Radiomics for Skull Base Oncology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Multimodal Neuroimaging Computing: Basics and Applications in Neurosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Non-Contrasted CT Radiomics for SAH Prognosis Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Brain MRI Radiomic First-Order Features for Presurgical Prediction of Meningioma Grading.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruchit V PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3200-4810
Shun YaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Raymond Y HuangDivision of Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Wenya Linda BiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4635-0247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative imaging analysis through radiomics is a powerful technology to non-invasively assess molecular correlates and guide clinical decision-making. There has been growing interest in image-based phenotyping for meningiomas given the complexities in management.

methodsWe systematically reviewed meningioma radiomics analyses published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until December 20, 2021. We compiled performance data and assessed publication quality using the radiomics quality score (RQS).

resultsA total of 170 publications were grouped into 5 categories of radiomics applications to meningiomas: Tumor detection and segmentation (21%), classification across neurologic diseases (54%), grading (14%), feature correlation (3%), and prognostication (8%). A majority focused on technical model development (73%) versus clinical applications (27%), with increasing adoption of deep learning. Studies utilized either private institutional (50%) or public (49%) datasets, with only 68% using a validation dataset. For detection and segmentation, radiomic models had a mean accuracy of 93.1 ± 8.1% and a dice coefficient of 88.8 ± 7.9%. Meningioma classification had a mean accuracy of 95.2 ± 4.0%. Tumor grading had a mean area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.85 ± 0.08. Correlation with meningioma biological features had a mean AUC of 0.89 ± 0.07. Prognostication of the clinical course had a mean AUC of 0.83 ± 0.08. While clinical studies had a higher mean RQS compared to technical studies, quality was low overall with a mean RQS of 6.7 ± 5.9 (possible range -8 to 36).

conclusionsThere has been global growth in meningioma radiomics, driven by data accessibility and novel computational methodology. Translatability toward complex tasks such as prognostication requires studies that improve quality, develop comprehensive patient datasets, and engage in prospective trials.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaHumansNeoplasm GradingProspective Studiesartificial intelligencecancer phenotypegenomicsmeningiomaradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36723606
PMCPMC10237421

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.