Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36724185›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2023

Understanding Nanocellulose-Water Interactions: Turning a Detriment into an Asset.

Laleh Solhi, Valentina Guccini, Katja Heise, Iina Solala, Elina Niinivaara, Wenyang Xu, Karl Mihhels, Marcel Kröger, Zhuojun Meng, Jakob Wohlert and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
38.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advances in Cellulose-Based Materials for Bionic Sensors.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Laleh SolhiDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8625-9982
Valentina GucciniDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.
Katja HeiseDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4105-6759
Iina SolalaDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8110-456X
Elina NiinivaaraDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.
Wenyang XuDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.
Karl MihhelsDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.
Marcel KrögerDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.
Zhuojun MengDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.
Jakob WohlertWallenberg Wood Science Centre (WWSC), Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-2571
Han TaoDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.
Emily D CranstonDepartment of Wood Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4210-9787
Eero KontturiDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, EspooFI-00076, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-5288
Aalto University · FIUniversity of British Columbia · CAÅbo Akademi University · FIUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNWallenberg Wood Science Center · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern technology has enabled the isolation of nanocellulose from plant-based fibers, and the current trend focuses on utilizing nanocellulose in a broad range of sustainable materials applications. Water is generally seen as a detrimental component when in contact with nanocellulose-based materials, just like it is harmful for traditional cellulosic materials such as paper or cardboard. However, water is an integral component in plants, and many applications of nanocellulose already accept the presence of water or make use of it. This review gives a comprehensive account of nanocellulose-water interactions and their repercussions in all key areas of contemporary research: fundamental physical chemistry, chemical modification of nanocellulose, materials applications, and analytical methods to map the water interactions and the effect of water on a nanocellulose matrix.

Identifiers

PMID36724185
PMCPMC9999435
OpenAlexW4318754323

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.