Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36726187›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

A NEw MOdel of individualized and patient-centered follow-up for women with gynecological cancer (the NEMO study)-protocol and rationale of a randomized clinical trial.

Stinne Holm Bergholdt, Dorte Gilsaa Hansen, Anna Thit Johnsen, Bo Snedker Boman, Pernille Tine Jensen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03838861 (A Randomised Clinical Trial Testing the Effect of an Individualised and Patient-centred Follow-up Program for Women With Gynaecological Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03838861 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomised Clinical Trial Testing the Effect of an Individualised and Patient-centred Follow-up Program for Women With Gynaecological Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2019 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsEmpowerment, Cervical Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Follow-up, Nurse-led, PROMArmsNEMO: NEw MOdel of follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stinne Holm BergholdtDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. stinne.holm.bergholdt@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-6399
Dorte Gilsaa HansenCenter for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anna Thit JohnsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Bo Snedker BomanPrivate practice, Hellerup, Denmark.
Pernille Tine JensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

Kræftens Bekæmpelse R195-A11844Odense Universitetshospital 18/25699Region Syddanmark, DK 16-13615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollow-up programs for gynecological cancer patients are currently under revision. There is limited evidence that traditional follow-up and clinical examinations improve survival in an early-stage gynecological setting. Further, traditional follow-up programs fail to accommodate the patient's need for psychosocial and sexual supportive care and to actively involve patients and their relatives in the follow-up process. Individualized programs may replace traditional routine follow-up with fixed intervals and length. Focusing on alarm-symptoms and self-reporting may ensure detection of recurrence while allowing a continuous attention to the patient's well-being and return to daily life. In this study, a nurse-led, individualized, and need-based intervention with a specific focus on patient empowerment is tested against a standard physician-led model primarily focusing on the detection of recurrence.

methodsThe study is designed as a clinical, randomized trial conducted in one of four national onco-gynecological centers in Denmark. Patients with early-stage cervical or endometrial cancer are eligible for inclusion. The intervention group undergoes individualized, nurse-led follow-up supporting patient empowerment including repeated use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) before each contact as a dialogue support tool. The follow-up contacts are mainly conducted by telephone. All project nurses attended a special training program before project start and are all well-educated and dedicated onco-gynecological nurses. The control group receives standard, physician-led, follow-up without use of ePROMs or specific focus on empowerment. The effect of the intervention is evaluated by questionnaires completed by patients at baseline (3 months after surgery) and 12, 18, and 36 months after surgery. Outcomes include empowerment using the Skill and technique subscale of the HEI-Q questionnaire as the primary outcome while fear of cancer recurrence and health-related quality of life as well as the remaining subscales of the HEI-Q represent secondary outcomes. Data is collected by use of the REDCap technology, which also provides a customized visual support function for the dialogue tool. DISCUSSION: This study will provide new information about follow-up in early-stage gynecological cancer settings and thereby contribute to improvement of future follow-up programs. Importantly, the study will provide knowledge about the impact of specific focus on patient empowerment in follow-up programs and, further, how to facilitate empowerment among patients.

trial registrationThe study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: ID no. NCT03838861. Registered on 6 February 2019. Protocol version 2, issue date 21 November 2022.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient-Centered CarePatientsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCancer follow-upEmpowermentGynecological cancerNurse interventionQuality of LifeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36726187
PMCPMC9890753

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.