Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36727403›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2023

High-dose carfilzomib achieves superior anti-tumor activity over low-dose and recaptures response in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma resistant to lowdose carfilzomib by co-inhibiting the β2 and β1 subunits of the proteasome complex.

Xiang Zhou, Andrej Besse, Jessica Peter, Maximilian Johannes Steinhardt, Cornelia Vogt, Silvia Nerreter, Eva Teufel, Emilia Stanojkovska, Xianghui Xiao, Hannah Hornburger and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiang ZhouDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Andrej BesseExperimental Oncology and Hematology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
Jessica PeterDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Maximilian Johannes SteinhardtDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Cornelia VogtDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Silvia NerreterDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Eva TeufelDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Emilia StanojkovskaDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Xianghui XiaoDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Hannah HornburgerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Larissa HaertleDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Max Mendez LopezExperimental Oncology and Hematology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
Umair MunawarDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Angela RiedelMildred Scheel Early Career Center, University of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Seungbin HanDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Elmer MauritsGorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden Institute of Chemistry and Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Leiden.
Herman S OverkleeftGorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden Institute of Chemistry and Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Leiden.
Bogdan FloreaGorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden Institute of Chemistry and Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Leiden.
Hermann EinseleDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
K Martin KortümDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Christoph DriessenExperimental Oncology and Hematology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen. christoph.driessen@kssg.ch.
Lenka BesseExperimental Oncology and Hematology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
Leo RascheDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Mildred Scheel Early Career Center, University of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of St.Gallen · CHNetherlands Metabolomics Centre · NLUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal carfilzomib dosing is a matter of debate. We analyzed the inhibition profiles of proteolytic proteasome subunits β5, β2 and β1 after low-dose (20/27 mg/m2) versus high-dose (≥36 mg/m2) carfilzomib in 103 pairs of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). β5 activity was inhibited (median inhibition >50%) in vivo by 20 mg/m2, whereas β2 and β1 were co-inhibited only by 36 and 56 mg/m2, respectively. Coinhibition of β2 (P=0.0001) and β1 activity (P=0.0005) differed significantly between high-dose and low-dose carfilzomib. Subsequently, high-dose carfilzomib showed significantly more effective proteasome inhibition than low-dose carfilzomib in vivo (P=0.0003). We investigated the clinical data of 114 patients treated with carfilzomib combinations. High-dose carfilzomib demonstrated a higher overall response rate (P=0.03) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.007) than low-dose carfilzomib. Therefore, we escalated the carfilzomib dose to ≥36 mg/m2 in 16 patients who progressed during low-dose carfilzomib-containing therapies. High-dose carfilzomib recaptured response (≥ partial remission) in nine (56%) patients with a median PFS of 4.4 months. Altogether, we provide the first in vivo evidence in RRMM patients that the molecular activity of high-dose carfilzomib differs from that of low-dose carfilzomib by coinhibition of β2 and β1 proteasome subunits and, consequently, high-dose carfilzomib achieves a superior anti-MM effect than low-dose carfilzomib and recaptures the response in RRMM resistant to low-dose carfilzomib. The optimal carfilzomib dose should be ≥36 mg/m2 to reach a sufficient anti-tumor activity, while the balance between efficacy and tolerability should be considered in each patient.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearOligopeptidesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome InhibitorscarfilzomibDexamethasoneOligopeptidesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36727403
PMCPMC10230416
OpenAlexW4318915818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.