Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36735601›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Which mouse multiparental population is right for your study? The Collaborative Cross inbred strains, their F1 hybrids, or the Diversity Outbred population.

Gregory R Keele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing facilitates accurate and cost-effective haplotype reconstruction in complex mouse crosses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gregory R KeeleThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-7900

Funding

Systems Genetic Analysis of Multi-parent CrossesR01GM070683 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BROMAN, KARL W, CHURCHILL, GARY A · 2004 to 2022
$6.8M
Bayesian Modeling of Mass-Spec Proteomics Data to Advance Studies of the Genetic Regulation of ProteinsF32GM134599 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI KEELE, GREGORY R · 2020 to 2021
$139k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM134599NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparental populations (MPPs) encompass greater genetic diversity than traditional experimental crosses of two inbred strains, enabling broader surveys of genetic variation underlying complex traits. Two such mouse MPPs are the Collaborative Cross (CC) inbred panel and the Diversity Outbred (DO) population, which are descended from the same eight inbred strains. Additionally, the F1 intercrosses of CC strains (CC-RIX) have been used and enable study designs with replicate outbred mice. Genetic analyses commonly used by researchers to investigate complex traits in these populations include characterizing how heritable a trait is, i.e. its heritability, and mapping its underlying genetic loci, i.e. its quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Here we evaluate the relative merits of these populations for these tasks through simulation, as well as provide recommendations for performing the quantitative genetic analyses. We find that sample populations that include replicate animals, as possible with the CC and CC-RIX, provide more efficient and precise estimates of heritability. We report QTL mapping power curves for the CC, CC-RIX, and DO across a range of QTL effect sizes and polygenic backgrounds for samples of 174 and 500 mice. The utility of replicate animals in the CC and CC-RIX for mapping QTLs rapidly decreased as traits became more polygenic. Only large sample populations of 500 DO mice were well-powered to detect smaller effect loci (7.5-10%) for highly complex traits (80% polygenic background). All results were generated with our R package musppr, which we developed to simulate data from these MPPs and evaluate genetic analyses from user-provided genotypes.

Indexed as

Collaborative Cross MiceQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsChromosome MappingComputer SimulationCrosses, GeneticGenotypeMiceCCCC-RIXDOheritabilityMAGICMPPmultiparent advanced generation intercrossQTLquantitative trait locusrecombinant inbred intercross

Identifiers

PMID36735601
PMCPMC10085760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.