Evidence mapPaperPMID 36737817Full record

SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023

Influence of Vitamin D supplementation on reproductive outcomes of infertile patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiangqian Meng, Jiayao Zhang, Qi Wan, Jihua Huang, Tingting Han, Ting Qu, Lin-Lin Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Vitamin D deficiency in a subfertility population and the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiangqian MengChengdu Xi'nan Gynecological Hospital Co. LTD, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Jiayao ZhangWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Qi WanChengdu Xi'nan Gynecological Hospital Co. LTD, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Jihua HuangChengdu Jinxin Research Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Tingting HanChengdu Jinxin Research Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Ting Qu *Chengdu Jinxin Research Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China. 543103775@qq.com.
Lin-Lin Yu *Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China. 17069596@qq.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese · CNChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital · CNWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow vitamin D status has been associated with an increased risk for infertility. Recent evidence regarding the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in improving reproductive outcomes is inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation could improve the reproductive outcomes of infertile patients and evaluate how the parameters of vitamin D supplementation affected the clinical pregnancy rate.

methodsWe searched seven electronic databases (CNKI, Cqvip, Wanfang, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library) up to March 2022. Randomized and cohort studies were collected to assess the reproductive outcomes difference between the intervention (vitamin D) vs. the control (placebo or none). Mantel-Haenszel random effects models were used. Effects were reported as odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO database registration number: CRD42022304018.

resultsTwelve eligible studies (n = 2352) were included: 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, n = 1677) and 3 cohort studies (n = 675). Pooled results indicated that infertile women treated with vitamin D had a significantly increased clinical pregnancy rate compared with the control group (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.24-2.34; I

conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis systematically investigated that moderate daily dosing of vitamin D supplementation could improve the clinical pregnancy rate of infertile women and reported the effects of vitamin D supplementation parameters on pregnancy outcomes. A larger sample size and high-quality RCTs are necessary to optimize the parameters of vitamin D supplementation to help more infertile patients benefit from this therapy.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsClinical pregnancy rateInfertile womenReproductive outcomesSupplementationVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID36737817
PMCPMC9896710
OpenAlexW4319161877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.