Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36738927›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2023

Blood Eosinophils for Prediction of Exacerbation in Preschool Children With Recurrent Wheezing.

Anne M Fitzpatrick, Jocelyn R Grunwell, Kirsten A Cottrill, Abby D Mutic, David T Mauger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Understanding recurrent wheezing: A parent's guide.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk Factors and Mechanisms Leading to Preschool Recurrent Wheeze and Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne M FitzpatrickDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga. Electronic address: anne.fitzpatrick@emory.edu.
Jocelyn R GrunwellDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga.
Kirsten A CottrillDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
Abby D MuticNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
David T MaugerDepartment of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pa.
Emory University · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Phenotypes and Endotypes of Preschool WheezeR01NR017939 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FITZPATRICK, ANNE MENTRO · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Mentored patient-oriented research in preschool wheezing disordersK24NR018866 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FITZPATRICK, ANNE MENTRO · 2020 to 2024
$625k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NINR NIH HHS K24 NR018866NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough clinical features of type 2 inflammation have been associated with poorer longitudinal outcomes in preschool children with recurrent wheezing, it remains difficult to predict which children are at highest risk for poor outcomes during a routine clinical encounter.

objectiveWe tested the hypothesis that prespecified cut points of blood eosinophil counts would predict exacerbation and treatment response outcomes in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and that prediction could be improved with the addition of a second biomarker.

methodsData from 3 clinical trials of 1,074 preschool children aged 12 to 71 months with recurrent wheezing were merged. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any exacerbation during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the annualized rate of wheezing exacerbations and the occurrence of any exacerbation requiring hospitalization. Exploratory analyses focused on exacerbation outcomes, offline exhaled nitric oxide concentrations, and caregiver-reported asthma control scores after inhaled corticosteroid treatment initiation.

resultsEach blood eosinophil cut point was associated with increased odds of exacerbation, higher exacerbation rates, and greater hospitalization occurrence in preschool children with recurrent wheezing. However, outcome detection was improved in children with more elevated blood eosinophil counts. Addition of a second biomarker of type 2 inflammation improved outcome detection and was further associated with an improved response to initiation of daily inhaled corticosteroids in exploratory analyses. However, the specificity of blood eosinophils was poor.

conclusionsAlthough validation studies are warranted, blood eosinophil cut points may be useful for clinical assessment and future studies of exacerbation and treatment response in preschool children with recurrent wheezing.

Indexed as

AsthmaEosinophilsAdrenal Cortex HormonesBiomarkersChild, PreschoolHumansInflammationRespiratory SoundsAdrenal Cortex HormonesBiomarkersAsthma exacerbationAsthma in childrenBlood eosinophilsPhenotypePreschool childSensitizationTreatment responseType 2 inflammationWheeze

Identifiers

PMID36738927
PMCPMC10164693
OpenAlexW4318941317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.