ArticleJournal of signal processing systems2022
Fine-tuning-based Transfer Learning for Characterization of Adeno-Associated Virus.
Article in Journal of signal processing systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mislabel Identification Using Transfer Learning-Based Ensemble Method.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026Article
- AAVolve: Concatenated long-read deep sequencing enables whole capsid tracking during shuffled AAV library selection.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Machine-learning-guided Directed Evolution for AAV Capsid Engineering.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and precise identification of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors play an important role in dose-dependent gene therapy. Although solid-state nanopore techniques can potentially be used to characterize AAV vectors by capturing ionic current, the existing data analysis techniques fall short of identifying them from their ionic current profiles. Recently introduced machine learning methods such as deep convolutional neural network (CNN), developed for image identification tasks, can be applied for such classification. However, with smaller data set for the problem in hand, it is not possible to train a deep neural network from scratch for accurate classification of AAV vectors. To circumvent this, we applied a pre-trained deep CNN (GoogleNet) model to capture the basic features from ionic current signals and subsequently used fine-tuning-based transfer learning to classify AAV vectors. The proposed method is very generic as it requires minimal preprocessing and does not require any handcrafted features. Our results indicate that fine-tuning-based transfer learning can achieve an average classification accuracy between 90 and 99% in three realizations with a very small standard deviation. Results also indicate that the classification accuracy depends on the applied electric field (across nanopore) and the time frame used for data segmentation. We also found that the fine-tuning of the deep network outperforms feature extraction-based classification for the resistive pulse dataset. To expand the usefulness of the fine-tuning-based transfer learning, we have tested two other pre-trained deep networks (ResNet50 and InceptionV3) for the classification of AAVs. Overall, the fine-tuning-based transfer learning from pre-trained deep networks is very effective for classification, though deep networks such as ResNet50 and InceptionV3 take significantly longer training time than GoogleNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.