ArticleHeliyon2023
Identification and validation of a five-gene prognostic signature based on bioinformatics analyses in breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- PKMYT1 in Cancer: Beyond Cell Cycle Checkpoints to Context-Dependent Therapeutic Vulnerability.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2026Review
- Integrative omics approaches to uncover liquid-based cancer-predicting biomarkers in Lynch syndrome.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- BRCAGenie: A machine learning-driven 43-gene polygenic risk score model for precision prediction of breast cancer survival.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the molecular interface of gene expression dynamics and prostate cancer susceptibility in response to HBCD exposure.Toxicology research · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of prognostic genes associated with T-cell exhaustion and macrophage polarization in breast cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Construction of a prognostic model via WGCNA combined with the LASSO algorithm for stomach adenocarcinoma patients.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify prognostic signatures to predict the prognosis of breast cancer (BRCA) patients based on a series of comprehensive analyses of gene expression data. Methods: The RNA-sequencing expression data and corresponding BRCA patient clinical data were collected from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. Firstly, the differently expressed genes (DEGs) related to prognosis between tumor tissues and normal tissues were ascertained by performing R package "limma". Secondly, the DEGs were used to construct a polygenic risk scoring model by the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression (Lasso-cox) analysis method. Thirdly, survival analysis was performed to investigate the risk score values in the TCGA cohort. And the enrichment analysis, immune cell infiltration levels analysis, and protein-protein internet (PPI) analysis were performed. Simultaneously, the GEO cohort was used to validate the model. Lastly, we constructed a nomogram to explore the influence of polygenic risk score and other clinical factors on the survival probability of patients with BRCA. Results: A total of 1000 DEGs including 396 upregulated genes and 604 downregulated genes were identified from the TCGA-BRCA dataset. We obtained 5 prognosis-related genes, as the key biomarkers by Lasso-cox analysis ( Conclusion: The 5 genes risk model constructed in this study had an independent predictive ability to distinguish patients with a high risk of death from those with a low-risk score, and it can be used as a practical and reliable prognostic tool for BRCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.