Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36748447›Full record

Trial reportEuropean endodontic journal2023

Effect of GuttaClear on Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Retreatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Duangrat Sirijindamai, Wassana Wichai, Somsak Mitrirattanakul, Jeeraphat Jantarat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European endodontic journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04326998 (Natural Gutta-percha Solvent Did Not Affect Postoperative Pain in Retreatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04326998 nacompletednot on this map

Natural Gutta-percha Solvent Did Not Affect Postoperative Pain in Retreatment: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Root Canal, RetreatmentArmssolvent, non-solvent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Duangrat SirijindamaiDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wassana WichaiDental Biomaterial Analysis and Research Center, Research Service Section, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somsak MitrirattanakulDepartment of Masticatory Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jeeraphat JantaratDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain after non-surgical root canal retreatment with or without GuttaClear.

methodsSixty participants were randomly distributed in this non-inferiority trial into two parallel singleblinded experimental groups (Group1: non-solvent, Group2: solvent). After root canal retreatment, the participants completed questionnaires using direct (numerical rating scales) and indirect (number of analgesics taken) measurements of postoperative pain at immediate, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h post-retreatment. The predisposing postoperative pain factors were recorded and analysed using Generalized Estimating Equations to identify correlated factors (α=0.05).

resultsThe pain incidence was not significantly different between the groups at any time point. The highest incidence of postoperative pain occurred immediately after retreatment (35%) and then decreased to 15% at 24 h (P<0.05). The number of participants requiring analgesics was 6.67% in the non-solvent group and 9.99% in the solvent group which were similar between the groups. Patients with a history of previous postoperative pain were 21.6-fold more likely to have postoperative pain than those without (P<0.05).

conclusionThere was no difference in postoperative pain or analgesics required after root canal retreatment with or without using GuttaClear. This study is registered in ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT04326998). (EEJ-2022-05-069).

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal TherapyAnalgesicsHumansPostoperative PainRetreatmentSolventsAnalgesicsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID36748447
PMCPMC10098468

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.