Evidence mapPaperPMID 36749428Full record

ReviewLasers in medical science2023

Biphasic dose response in the anti-inflammation experiment of PBM.

Fang Nie, Shaolong Hao, Yu Ji, Yan Zhang, Hao Sun, Melissa Will, Wei Han, YuChuan Ding

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fang NieCentral Laboratory, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shaolong HaoCentral Laboratory, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yu JiCentral Laboratory, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan ZhangCentral Laboratory, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hao SunCentral Laboratory, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Melissa WillDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Wei HanCentral Laboratory, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. dr-han1972@mail.ccmu.edu.cn.
YuChuan DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. yding@med.wayne.edu.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive laser irradiation can induce photobiomodulation (PBM) effects in cells and tissues, which can help reduce inflammation and pain in several clinical scenarios. The purpose of this study is to review the current literature to verify whether PBM can produce dose effects in anti-inflammatory experiments by summarizing the clinical and experimental effects of different laser parameters of several diseases. The so-called Arndt-Schulz curve is often used to describe two-phase dose reactions, assuming small doses of therapeutic stimulation, medium doses of inhibition, and large doses of killing. In the past decade, more and more attention has been paid to the clinical application of PBM, especially in the field of anti-inflammation, because it represents a non-invasive strategy with few contraindications. Although there are different types of lasers available, their use is adjusted by different parameters. In general, the parameters involved are wavelength, energy density, power output, and radiation time. However, due to the biphasic effect, the scientific and medical communities remain puzzled by the ways in which the application of PBM must be modified depending on its clinical application. This article will discuss these parameter adjustments and will then also briefly introduce two controversial theories of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of PBM. A better understanding of the extent of dualistic dose response in low-intensity laser therapy is necessary to optimize clinical treatment. It also allows us to explore the most dependable mechanism for PBM use and, ultimately, standardize treatment for patients with various diseases.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyAnti-Inflammatory AgentsHumansInflammationLasersLightAnti-Inflammatory AgentsArndt-Schulz curveBiphasic dose responseInflammationLow-energy laser therapyPhotobiomodulation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.