ArticleBMJ global health2023
What's in a name? Unpacking 'Community
Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strengthening Indigenous community engagement in clinical research: a formative evaluation in Northern British Columbia.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Community engagement to support public health: mixed-method evaluation evidence on COVID-19 attitudes and practices in Lao PDR.Global health action · 2025Article
- We move together: a realist evaluation of the Safe Motherhood Action Groups in Eastern Province, Zambia.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Institutionalising community participation in decision-making in maternal and newborn health services in low-and middle-income countries: An analysis from 102 national health ministries.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- How does community health feature in Global Financing Facility planning documents to support reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and nutrition (RMNAH-N)? insights from six francophone West African countries.Global health action · 2024Article
- Spatial Access to Continuous Maternal and Perinatal Health Care Services in Low-Resource Settings: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Advisory groups in realist reviews: Systematically mapping current research and recommendations for practice.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Review
- Trust in healthcare: methodological and conceptual insights from mixed-method research in Lao People's Democratic Republic.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Community engagement and the centrality of 'working relationships' in health research.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Understanding communication in community engagement for maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- Institutionalising community engagement for quality of care: moving beyond the rhetoric.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Community-engagement in research in humanitarian settings.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- A realist review protocol on communications for community engagement in maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEngaging the community as actors within reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) programmes (referred to as 'community
methodsSeven academic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Global Health), two grey literature databases (OAIster, OpenGrey) and relevant organisation websites were searched for documents that described 'community
conclusionAcross the literature, there is inconsistency in the usage of 'community
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.