Evidence mapPaperPMID 36754341Full record

SynthesisBiological psychiatry2023

Maternal Mental Health and Offspring Brain Development: An Umbrella Review of Prenatal Interventions.

Claudia Lugo-Candelas, Ardesheer Talati, Caila Glickman, Mariely Hernandez, Pamela Scorza, Catherine Monk, Ai Kubo, Chiaying Wei, Andre Sourander, Cristiane S Duarte

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia Lugo-CandelasNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ardesheer TalatiNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Caila GlickmanNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Mariely HernandezDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Pamela ScorzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Catherine MonkNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ai KuboDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California.
Chiaying WeiNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Andre SouranderDepartment of Child Psychiatry, Turku University Hospital, Turku University, Turku, Finland.
Cristiane S DuarteNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: Cristiane.Duarte@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USTurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

NIH HHS UH3 OD023328NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH117452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea that risk for psychiatric disorders may be transmitted intergenerationally via prenatal programming places interest in the prenatal period as a critical moment during which intervention efforts may have a strong impact, yet studies testing whether prenatal interventions also protect offspring are limited. The present umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) of randomized controlled trials aimed to synthesize the available evidence and highlight promising avenues for intervention. Overall, the literature provides mixed and limited evidence in support of prenatal interventions. Thirty SRMAs were included. Of the 23 SRMAs that reported on prenatal depression interventions, 16 found a significant effect (average standard mean difference = -0.45, SD = 0.25). Similarly, 13 of the 20 SRMAs that reported on anxiety outcomes documented significant reductions (average standard mean difference = -0.76, SD = 0.95 or -0.53/0.53 excluding one outlier). Only 4 SRMAs reported child outcomes, and only 2 (of 10) analyses showed significant effects of prenatal interventions (massage and telephone support on neonatal resuscitation [relative risk = 0.43] and neonatal intensive care unit admissions [relative risk = 0.91]). Notably missing, perhaps due to our strict inclusion criteria (inclusion of randomized controlled trials only), were interventions focusing on key facets of prenatal health (e.g., whole diet, sleep). Structural interventions (housing, access to health care, economic security) were not included, although initial success has been documented in non-SRMAs. Most notably, none of the SRMAs focused on offspring mental health or neurodevelopmental outcomes. Given the possibility that interventions deployed in this period will positively impact the next generation, randomized trials that focus on offspring outcomes are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthBrainChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyResuscitationSystematic Reviews as TopicIntergenerational transmissionPrenatal interventionPrenatal maternal distressPrenatal programmingUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID36754341
PMCPMC10512172
OpenAlexW4319310997

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.