Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36758102›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Prevalence of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) and treatment seeking behavior of PKDL patients in Nepal.

Anand Ballabh Joshi, Megha Raj Banjara, Murari Lal Das, Pragyan Ghale, Krishna Raj Pant, Niraj Parajuli, Uttam Raj Pyakurel, Gokarna Raj Dahal, Chuman Lal Das, Axel Kroeger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis burden at the village level in selected high visceral leishmaniasis endemic upazilas in Bangladesh.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anand Ballabh JoshiPublic Health and Infectious Disease Research Center (PHIDReC), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Megha Raj BanjaraCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5024-6127
Murari Lal DasPublic Health and Infectious Disease Research Center (PHIDReC), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Pragyan GhalePublic Health and Infectious Disease Research Center (PHIDReC), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Krishna Raj PantPublic Health and Infectious Disease Research Center (PHIDReC), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Niraj ParajuliBir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Uttam Raj PyakurelEpidemiology and Disease Control Division, Department of Health Services, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gokarna Raj DahalEpidemiology and Disease Control Division, Department of Health Services, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Chuman Lal DasEpidemiology and Disease Control Division, Department of Health Services, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Axel KroegerCentre for Medicine and Society, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Abraham AseffaWHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Nepal, the burden of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is not known since there is no active case detection of PKDL by the national programme. PKDL patients could pose a challenge to sustain visceral leishmaniasis (VL) elimination. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of PKDL and assess PKDL patients' knowledge on VL and PKDL, and stigma associated with PKDL. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHousehold surveys were conducted in 98 VL endemic villages of five districts that reported the highest number of VL cases within 2018-2021. A total of 6,821 households with 40373 individuals were screened for PKDL. Cases with skin lesions were referred to hospitals and examined by dermatologists. Suspected PKDL cases were tested with rK39 and smear microscopy from skin lesions. An integrated diagnostic approach was implemented in two hospitals with a focus on management of leprosy cases where cases with non-leprosy skin lesions were tested for PKDL with rK39. Confirmed PKDL patients were interviewed to assess knowledge and stigma associated with PKDL, using explanatory model interview catalogue (EMIC) with maximum score of 36. Among 147 cases with skin lesions in the survey, 9 (6.12%) were confirmed as PKDL by dermatologists at the hospital. The prevalence of PKDL was 2.23 per 10,000 population. Among these 9 PKDL cases, 5 had a past history of VL and 4 did not. PKDL cases without a past history of VL were detected among the "new foci", Surkhet but none in Palpa. None of the cases negative for leprosy were positive for PKDL. There was very limited knowledge of PKDL and VL among PKDL cases. PKDL patients suffered to some degree from social and psychological stigma (mean ± s.d. score = 17.89 ± 12.84). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Strengthening the programme in PKDL case detection and management would probably contribute to sustenance of VL elimination. Awareness raising activities to promote knowledge and reduce social stigma should be conducted in VL endemic areas.

Indexed as

Leishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis, VisceralLeprosyHumansIndiaNepalPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID36758102
PMCPMC9946221

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.