Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759774›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Pregnancy associated cancer, timing of birth and clinical decision making-a NSW data linkage study.

Nadom Safi, Zhuoyang Li, Antoinette Anazodo, Marc Remond, Andrew Hayen, David Currow, David Roder, Nada Hamad, Michael Nicholl, Adrienne Gordon and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. In situ and localized primary invasive pregnancy-associated melanoma: Maternal and perinatal outcomes.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Nadom Safi *College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, 130 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Zhuoyang Li *College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, 130 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Antoinette AnazodoPrince of Wales Hospital, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Marc RemondCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, 130 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Andrew HayenSchool of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
David CurrowUniversity of Wollongong, the Vice-Chancellor's Unit, NSW, Wollongong, 2522, Australia.
David RoderUniversity of South Australia, Population Health, Beat Cancer Project, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nada HamadThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Michael NichollFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Adrienne GordonFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Jane FrawleySchool of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Penelope FotheringhamCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, 130 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Elizabeth SullivanCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, 130 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. E.Sullivan@newcastle.edu.au.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Cancer Council NSW RG 18-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC), comprising cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within one year postpartum, is increasing. We investigated the obstetric management and outcomes of women with PAC and their babies.

methodsA population-based observational study of all women who gave birth between 1994 and 2013 in New South Wales, Australia. Women were stratified into three groups: those diagnosed during pregnancy (gestational cancer group), those diagnosed within one year of giving birth (postpartum cancer group), and a no-PAC group. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between PAC and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

resultsOne million seven hundred eighty-eight thousand four hundred fifty-onepregnancies were included-601 women (614 babies) were in the gestational cancer group, 1772 women (1816 babies) in the postpartum cancer group, and 1,786,078 women (1,813,292 babies) in the no-PAC group. The overall crude incidence of PAC was 132.7/100,000 women giving birth. The incidence of PAC increased significantly over the twenty-year study period from 93.5/100,000 in 1994 to 162.5/100,000 in 2013 (2.7% increase per year, 95% CI 1.9 - 3.4%, p-value < 0.001). This increase was independent of maternal age. The odds of serious maternal complications (such as acute abdomen, acute renal failure, and hysterectomy) were significantly higher in the gestational cancer group (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 5.07, 95% CI 3.72 - 6.90) and the postpartum cancer group (AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16 - 2.09). There was no increased risk of perinatal mortality in babies born to women with PAC. However, babies of women with gestational cancer (AOR 8.96, 95% CI 6.96 - 11.53) or postpartum cancer (AOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.81) were more likely to be planned preterm birth. Furthermore, babies of women with gestational cancer had increased odds of a severe neonatal adverse outcome (AOR 3.13, 95% CI 2.52 - 4.35).

conclusionWomen with PAC are more likely to have serious maternal complications. While their babies are not at increased risk of perinatal mortality, they are more likely to experience poorer perinatal outcomes associated with preterm birth. The higher rate of birth intervention among women with gestational cancers reflects the complexity of clinical decision-making in this context.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPerinatal DeathPremature BirthClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal AgeParturitionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeIncidenceNeoplasmsPerinatal deathPregnancyPregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID36759774
PMCPMC9909861
OpenAlexW4319787128

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.