Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761969›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Designing home-based physical activity programs for rural cancer survivors: A survey of technology access and preferences.

Elizabeth A Salerno, Rohana Gao, Jason Fanning, Neha P Gothe, Lindsay L Peterson, Allison B Anbari, Maura M Kepper, Jingqin Luo, Aimee S James, Edward McAuley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A SalernoDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Rohana GaoAcademic Program of Medical Education, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jason FanningDepartment of Gerontology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Neha P GotheDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Lindsay L PetersonAlvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Allison B AnbariSinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Maura M KepperPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jingqin LuoDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Aimee S JamesDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Edward McAuleyDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Missouri · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Shawn Shafer · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Mentored Education for Dissemination and Implementation Science (MEDIS) ProgramR25DK123008 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK123008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While technology advances have increased the popularity of remote interventions in underserved and rural cancer communities, less is understood about technology access and preferences for home-based physical activity programs in this cancer survivor population. Purpose: To determine access, preferences, and needs, for a home-based physical activity program in rural cancer survivors. Methods: A Qualtrics Research Panel was recruited to survey adults with cancer across the United States. Participants self-reported demographics, cancer characteristics, technology access and usage, and preferences for a home-based physical activity program. The Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) assessed current levels of physical activity. Descriptive statistics included means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and frequencies for categorical variables. Independent samples t-tests explored differences between rural and non-rural participants. Results: Participants (N=298; mean age=55.2 ± 16.5) had a history of cancer (mean age at diagnosis=46.5), with the most commonly reported cancer type being breast (25.5%), followed by prostate (16.1%). 74.2% resided in rural hometowns. 95% of participants reported accessing the internet daily. On a scale of 0-100, computer/laptop (M=63.4) and mobile phone (M=54.6) were the most preferred delivery modes for a home-based physical activity intervention, and most participants preferred balance/flexibility (72.2%) and aerobic (53.9%) exercises. Desired intervention elements included a frequency of 2-3 times a week (53.5%) for at least 20 minutes (75.7%). While there were notable rural disparities present (e.g., older age at diagnosis, lower levels of education; Conclusion: These findings provide insights into the preferred physical activity intervention (e.g., computer delivery, balance/flexibility exercises) in rural cancer survivors, while highlighting the need for personalization. Future efforts should consider these preferences when designing and delivering home-based interventions in this population.

Indexed as

cancer survivorshipintervention designphysical activityruralsurveytechnology

Identifiers

PMID36761969
PMCPMC9907024
OpenAlexW4317939685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.