Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762709›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2023

Prognostic value of the preoperative albumin-bilirubin score among patients with stages I-III gastric cancer undergoing radical resection: A retrospective study.

Xiang Wang, Jingwei Zheng, Hui Yang, Xinxin Yang, Wentao Cai, Xiaodong Chen, Weiteng Zhang, Xian Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiang WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Jingwei ZhengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Hui YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Xinxin YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Wentao CaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaodong ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Weiteng ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Xian ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1164-4832
Wenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was originally used to accurately assess liver dysfunction and predict the prognoses of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Following its more recent application to patients with gastrointestinal tumors, this study analyzed the prognostic value of the ALBI score in Chinese patients with advanced resectable (tumor-node-metastasis [TNM] stages I-III) gastric cancer (GC). This study investigated 1185 patients with advanced GC, including 429 with TNM stage I. The patients were divided into training and verifications groups (593 and 592 patients, respectively) in which these patients were classified as high risk (ALBI score ≥ -2.65) or low risk (ALBI score < -2.65). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed, and a visual survival prediction model (nomogram) was created. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients who were low-risk and high-risk according to their ALBI scores had significantly different survival rates in both the training and verification groups (p < 0.01). The difference was also significant when analyzing only patients with TNM stage I GC (p = 0.031). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the ALBI score (p = 0.014), age (p < 0.001), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score (p = 0.024), sarcopenia (p = 0.049), tumor differentiation (p = 0.027), and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for survival. Our survival prediction model that incorporated the ALBI score accurately predicted the 5-year survival rate of Chinese patients with GC. Therefore, the ALBI score is a valid clinical indicator and good predictor of survival after surgery for progressive GC. Moreover, this score is simple to derive and does not burden patients with additional costs.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsBilirubinHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminBilirubinSerum Albumin

Identifiers

PMID36762709
PMCPMC10175983
OpenAlexW4319826974

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.