Technical aspects should also be fully considered in order to obtain better effectiveness of RDN.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Guidelines for the appropriate use of renal denervation systems in Japan: endorsed by the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS), and their positioning in the JSH 2025 guidelines.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
   Guideline

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  2022 Renal denervation therapy for the treatment of hypertension: a statement from the Thai Hypertension Society.2023

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as