ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Clinical Evidence of Circulating Tumor DNA Application in Aggressive Breast Cancer.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ISL@mTOMV nanoparticles: a promising approach for VM-targeted therapy in breast cancer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Pathological features of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in Shenzhen, China: a single-center study.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapies in cancer patients.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in triple-negative breast cancer: a promising tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Cytobiological Alterations Induced by Celecoxib as an Anticancer Agent for Breast and Metastatic Breast Cancer.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is clinically and biologically heterogeneous and is classified into different subtypes according to the molecular landscape of the tumor. Triple-negative breast cancer is a subtype associated with higher tumor aggressiveness, poor prognosis, and poor response to treatment. In metastatic breast cancer, approximately 6% to 10% of new breast cancer cases are initially staged IV (de novo metastatic disease). The number of metastatic recurrences is estimated to be 20-30% of all existing breast tumor cases, whereby the need to develop specific genetic markers to improve the prognosis of patients suffering from these deadly forms of breast cancer. As an alternative, liquid biopsy methods can minutely identify the molecular architecture of breast cancer, including aggressive forms, which provides new perspectives for more precise diagnosis and more effective therapeutics. This review aimed to summarize the current clinical evidence for the application of circulating tumor DNA in managing breast cancer by detailing the increased usefulness of this biomarker as a diagnostic, prognostic, monitoring, and surveillance marker for breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.