Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767747›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Machine Learning Approaches for the Prediction of Hepatitis B and C Seropositivity.

Valeriu Harabor, Raluca Mogos, Aurel Nechita, Ana-Maria Adam, Gigi Adam, Alina-Sinziana Melinte-Popescu, Marian Melinte-Popescu, Mariana Stuparu-Cretu, Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache, Elena Mihalceanu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valeriu HaraborClinical and Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University, 800216 Galati, Romania.
Raluca MogosDepartment of Mother and Child, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Aurel NechitaClinical and Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University, 800216 Galati, Romania.
Ana-Maria AdamClinical and Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University, 800216 Galati, Romania.
Gigi AdamDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University, 800216 Galati, Romania.
Alina-Sinziana Melinte-PopescuDepartment of Mother and Newborn Care, Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, 'Ștefan cel Mare' University, 720229 Suceava, Romania.
Marian Melinte-PopescuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, 'Ștefan cel Mare' University, 720229 Suceava, Romania.
Mariana Stuparu-CretuMedical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University, 800216 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0626-2023
Ingrid-Andrada VasilacheDepartment of Mother and Child, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4718-392X
Elena MihalceanuDepartment of Mother and Child, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Alexandru CarauleanuDepartment of Mother and Child, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9112-7039
Anca BivoleanuDepartment of Mother and Child, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Anamaria HaraborClinical and Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University, 800216 Galati, Romania.
"Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati · ROGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROŞtefan cel Mare University of Suceava · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The identification of patients at risk for hepatitis B and C viral infection is a challenge for the clinicians and public health specialists. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the predictive performances of four machine learning-based models for the prediction of HBV and HCV status. (2) Methods: This prospective cohort screening study evaluated adults from the North-Eastern and South-Eastern regions of Romania between January 2022 and November 2022 who underwent viral hepatitis screening in their family physician's offices. The patients' clinical characteristics were extracted from a structured survey and were included in four machine learning-based models: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), naïve Bayes (NB), and K nearest neighbors (KNN), and their predictive performance was assessed. (3) Results: All evaluated models performed better when used to predict HCV status. The highest predictive performance was achieved by KNN algorithm (accuracy: 98.1%), followed by SVM and RF with equal accuracies (97.6%) and NB (95.7%). The predictive performance of these models was modest for HBV status, with accuracies ranging from 78.2% to 97.6%. (4) Conclusions: The machine learning-based models could be useful tools for HCV infection prediction and for the risk stratification process of adult patients who undergo a viral hepatitis screening program.

Indexed as

Hepatitis AHepatitis BHepatitis CAdultBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesSupport Vector Machinehepatitis Bhepatitis Cmachine learningpredictionscreening

Identifiers

PMID36767747
PMCPMC9915359
OpenAlexW4318474586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.