ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Patient-Specific Numerical Simulations of Endovascular Procedures in Complex Aortic Pathologies: Review and Clinical Perspectives.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrated fluid-dynamic and structural pipeline to assess atrial hemodynamics before and after left atrial appendage occluder deployment in a patient-specific anatomy.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- The Influence of Stent-Strut Morphology on Iliac Limb Hemodynamics During EVAR in Compliant 3D-Printed Arterial Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Validation of a Deep Learning U-Net Algorithm for Multistructure Segmentation of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms including Lumen, Thrombus, and Calcifications.EJVES vascular forum · 2026Article
- High-fidelity virtual endovascular aneurysm repair model as a decision-making tool.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Computational Simulation of Respiration-Induced Deformation of Renal Arteries After EVAR.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Simulation-Based Training in Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: Toward a New Educational Standard.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Cardiovascular medtech: the grand challenge of computer simulations.Frontiers in medical technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The endovascular technique is used in the first line treatment in many complex aortic pathologies. Its clinical outcome is mostly determined by the appropriate selection of a stent-graft for a specific patient and the operator's experience. New tools are still needed to assist practitioners with decision making before and during procedures. For this purpose, numerical simulation enables the digital reproduction of an endovascular intervention with various degrees of accuracy. In this review, we introduce the basic principles and discuss the current literature regarding the use of numerical simulation for endovascular management of complex aortic diseases. Further, we give the future direction of everyday clinical applications, showing that numerical simulation is about to revolutionize how we plan and carry out endovascular interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.