Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36771964›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Microfibers from Colombian Cocoa Pod Husk via Chemical Treatment with Pressure Effects.

Ana Sofia Hozman-Manrique, Andres J Garcia-Brand, María Hernández-Carrión, Alicia Porras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Sofia Hozman-ManriqueGrupo de Diseño de Productos y Procesos (GDPP), Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, CR 1 No. 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7236-5338
Andres J Garcia-BrandGrupo de Diseño de Productos y Procesos (GDPP), Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, CR 1 No. 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1716-1893
María Hernández-CarriónGrupo de Diseño de Productos y Procesos (GDPP), Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, CR 1 No. 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0668-4189
Alicia PorrasGrupo de Diseño de Productos y Procesos (GDPP), Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, CR 1 No. 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-4101

Funding

Universidad de Los Andes Vice Presidency for Research & Creation FAPA program at Universidad de los Andes
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the current challenges is to add value to agro-industrial wastes, and the cocoa industry generates about 10 tons of cocoa pod husks in Colombia for each ton of cocoa beans, which are incinerated and cause environmental damage. This study characterized the Colombian cocoa pod husk (CPH) and to isolate and characterize cellulose microfibers (tCPH) extracted via chemical treatment and pressure. Chemical and physical analyses of CPH were performed, and a pretreatment method for CPH fibers was developed, which is followed by a hydrolysis method involving high pressure in an autoclave machine with an alkaline medium (6% NaOH), and finally, bleaching of the fiber to obtain tCPH. The tCPH cellulose microfibers were also chemically and physically analyzed and characterized by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA). Chemical and physical characterization showed a decrease in lignin content in tCPH. FTIR analysis showed the absence of some peaks in tCPH with respect to the CPH spectrum; XRD results showed an increase in crystallinity for tCPH compared to CPH, due to a higher presence of crystalline cellulose in tCPH. SEM images included a control fiber treated without high pressure (tCPHnpe), and agglomerated fibers were observed, whereas cellulose microfibers with a mean diameter of 10 ± 2.742 μm were observed in tCPH. Finally, with TGA and DTGA it was confirmed that in tCPH, the hemicellulose and lignin were removed more successfully than in the control fiber (tCPHnpe), showing that the treatment with pressure was effective at isolating the cellulose microfibers from cocoa pod husk.

Indexed as

agro-industrial wastescharacterizationlignocellulosic materialreinforcement

Identifiers

PMID36771964
PMCPMC9919290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.