Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772430›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Hybrid Generic Framework for Heart Problem Diagnosis Based on a Machine Learning Paradigm.

Alaa Menshawi, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Nasser Allheeib, Giancarlo Fortino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alaa MenshawiInformation Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4582-1606
Mohammad Mehedi HassanInformation Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3479-3606
Nasser AllheeibInformation Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.
Giancarlo FortinoDepartment of Informatics, Modeling, Electronics, and Systems, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4039-891X
King Saud University · SAUniversity of Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early, valid prediction of heart problems would minimize life threats and save lives, while lack of prediction and false diagnosis can be fatal. Addressing a single dataset alone to build a machine learning model for the identification of heart problems is not practical because each country and hospital has its own data schema, structure, and quality. On this basis, a generic framework has been built for heart problem diagnosis. This framework is a hybrid framework that employs multiple machine learning and deep learning techniques and votes for the best outcome based on a novel voting technique with the intention to remove bias from the model. The framework contains two consequent layers. The first layer contains simultaneous machine learning models running over a given dataset. The second layer consolidates the outputs of the first layer and classifies them as a second classification layer based on novel voting techniques. Prior to the classification process, the framework selects the top features using a proposed feature selection framework. It starts by filtering the columns using multiple feature selection methods and considers the top common features selected. Results from the proposed framework, with 95.6% accuracy, show its superiority over the single machine learning model, classical stacking technique, and traditional voting technique. The main contribution of this work is to demonstrate how the prediction probabilities of multiple models can be exploited for the purpose of creating another layer for final output; this step neutralizes any model bias. Another experimental contribution is proving the complete pipeline's ability to be retrained and used for other datasets collected using different measurements and with different distributions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProbabilityartificial intelligence (AI)decision support system (DSS)deep learning (DL)feature selectionheart diseasesmachine learning (ML)model votingUCI dataset

Identifiers

PMID36772430
PMCPMC9921250
OpenAlexW4318200577

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.