ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023
Prognostic artificial intelligence model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery based on nutrition and body morphometry.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric cancer survival prediction using artificial intelligence models based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Malnutrition in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction of early death in peripheral T-cell lymphoma-NOS patients based on machine learning.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Deciphering the predictors of endometrial nonbenign lesions in asymptomatic postmenopausal women via explainable machine learning.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Gastric Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancers: Diagnostic, prognostic, and surgical strategies.Cancer letters · 2025Review
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting myocardial injury in patients with high cervical spinal cord injury.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting the risk of significant liver fibrosis in patients with diabetic retinopathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction for Incident Hypertension Based on Regular Health Checkup Data: Derivation and Validation in 2 Independent Nationwide Cohorts in South Korea and Japan.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The role of diet in cancer: the potential of shaping public policy and clinical outcomes in the UK.Genes & nutrition · 2024Review
- Diagnosis to dissection: AI's role in early detection and surgical intervention for gastric cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- CircInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Application progress of artificial intelligence in tumor diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- [Prognostic Value of PCMT1 Expression in Gastric Cancer and Its Regulatory Effect on Spindle Assembly Checkpoints].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023Article
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting skeletal muscle loss during surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Respiratory Distress Syndrome Prediction for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Korean Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastric Cancer Imaging With Emphasis on Diagnostic Imaging and Body Morphometry.Journal of gastric cancer · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersonalized survival prediction is important in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy based on large datasets with many variables including time-varying factors in nutrition and body morphometry. One year after gastrectomy might be the optimal timing to predict long-term survival because most patients experience significant nutritional change, muscle loss, and postoperative changes in the first year after gastrectomy. We aimed to develop a personalized prognostic artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastrectomy.
methodsFrom a prospectively built gastric surgery registry from a tertiary hospital, 4025 gastric cancer patients (mean age 56.1 ± 10.9, 36.2% females) treated gastrectomy and survived more than a year were selected. Eighty-nine variables including clinical and derived time-varying variables were used as input variables. We proposed a multi-tree extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, an ensemble AI algorithm based on 100 datasets derived from repeated five-fold cross-validation. Internal validation was performed in split datasets (n = 1121) by comparing our proposed model and six other AI algorithms. External validation was performed in 590 patients from other hospitals (mean age 55.9 ± 11.2, 37.3% females). We performed a sensitivity analysis to analyse the effect of the nutritional and fat/muscle indices using a leave-one-out method.
resultsIn the internal validation, our proposed model showed AUROC of 0.8237, which outperformed the other AI algorithms (0.7988-0.8165), 80.00% sensitivity, 72.34% specificity, and 76.17% balanced accuracy. In the external validation, our model showed AUROC of 0.8903, 86.96% sensitivity, 74.60% specificity, and 80.78% balanced accuracy. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the nutritional and fat/muscle indices influenced the balanced accuracy by 0.31% and 6.29% in the internal and external validation set, respectively. Our developed AI model was published on a website for personalized survival prediction.
conclusionsOur proposed AI model provides substantially good performance in predicting 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery. The nutritional and fat/muscle indices contributed to increase the prediction performance of our AI model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.