Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36775841›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023

Prognostic artificial intelligence model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery based on nutrition and body morphometry.

Heewon Chung, Yousun Ko, In-Seob Lee, Hoon Hur, Jimi Huh, Sang-Uk Han, Kyung Won Kim, Jinseok Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. CircInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. [Prognostic Value of PCMT1 Expression in Gastric Cancer and Its Regulatory Effect on Spindle Assembly Checkpoints].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heewon ChungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4039-1419
Yousun KoDepartment of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2181-9555
In-Seob LeeDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3099-0140
Hoon HurDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5435-5363
Jimi HuhDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8832-6165
Sang-Uk HanDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5615-4162
Kyung Won KimDepartment of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-5970
Jinseok LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-490X
Ajou University · KRUlsan College · KRKyung Hee University · KR

Funding

Asan Institute for Life Sciences and Corporate Relations of Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea 2017IT0216Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI18C1216National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1A2C1014829National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1F1A1048267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized survival prediction is important in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy based on large datasets with many variables including time-varying factors in nutrition and body morphometry. One year after gastrectomy might be the optimal timing to predict long-term survival because most patients experience significant nutritional change, muscle loss, and postoperative changes in the first year after gastrectomy. We aimed to develop a personalized prognostic artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastrectomy.

methodsFrom a prospectively built gastric surgery registry from a tertiary hospital, 4025 gastric cancer patients (mean age 56.1 ± 10.9, 36.2% females) treated gastrectomy and survived more than a year were selected. Eighty-nine variables including clinical and derived time-varying variables were used as input variables. We proposed a multi-tree extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, an ensemble AI algorithm based on 100 datasets derived from repeated five-fold cross-validation. Internal validation was performed in split datasets (n = 1121) by comparing our proposed model and six other AI algorithms. External validation was performed in 590 patients from other hospitals (mean age 55.9 ± 11.2, 37.3% females). We performed a sensitivity analysis to analyse the effect of the nutritional and fat/muscle indices using a leave-one-out method.

resultsIn the internal validation, our proposed model showed AUROC of 0.8237, which outperformed the other AI algorithms (0.7988-0.8165), 80.00% sensitivity, 72.34% specificity, and 76.17% balanced accuracy. In the external validation, our model showed AUROC of 0.8903, 86.96% sensitivity, 74.60% specificity, and 80.78% balanced accuracy. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the nutritional and fat/muscle indices influenced the balanced accuracy by 0.31% and 6.29% in the internal and external validation set, respectively. Our developed AI model was published on a website for personalized survival prediction.

conclusionsOur proposed AI model provides substantially good performance in predicting 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery. The nutritional and fat/muscle indices contributed to increase the prediction performance of our AI model.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceFemaleGastrectomyHumansMalePrognosisArtificial intelligenceGastric cancerPredictionPrognosisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36775841
PMCPMC10067496
OpenAlexW4320495332

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.