Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780262›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2023

Negative interpretation bias connects to real-world daily affect: A multistudy approach.

Nikki A Puccetti, William J Villano, Caitlin A Stamatis, Kimberly Arditte Hall, Vilet F Torrez, Maital Neta, Kiara R Timpano, Aaron S Heller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Facing ambiguity: What we do in the space between stimulus and response.Current directions in psychological science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nikki A PuccettiDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-0718
William J VillanoDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami.ORCID 0000-0002-2865-7165
Caitlin A StamatisDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami.
Kimberly Arditte HallDepartment of Psychology and Philosophy, Framingham State University.
Vilet F TorrezDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami.
Maital NetaDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Kiara R TimpanoDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami.
Aaron S HellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami.

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training Program in Digital Mental HealthT32MH115882 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Darren Gergle, DAVID CURTIS MOHR · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
Functional Brain Networks Mediating Individual Differences in Valence BiasR01MH111640 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI NETA, MAITAL · 2017 to 2022
$1.8M
Using Real-World, Personally Meaningful Events to build Computational Models of EmotionR21MH125311 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI HELLER, AARON S · 2021 to 2022
$414k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111640NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH125311NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative interpretation bias, the tendency to appraise ambiguous stimuli as threatening, shapes our emotional lives. Various laboratory tasks, which differ in stimuli features and task procedures, can quantify negative interpretation bias. However, it is unknown whether these tasks globally predict individual differences in real-world negative (NA) and positive (PA) affect. Across two studies, we tested whether different lab-based negative interpretation bias tasks predict daily NA and PA, measured via mobile phone across months. To quantify negative interpretation bias, Study 1 (

Indexed as

EmotionsIndividualityAffectBiasHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36780262
PMCPMC10478317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.