Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780583›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2023

Impact of the Immediate Release of Clinical Information Rules on Health Care Delivery to Patients With Cancer.

P Abena Anyidoho, Claire F Verschraegen, Merry Jennifer Markham, Steven Alberts, John Sweetenham, Kendra Cameron, Taher Abu Hejleh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P Abena AnyidohoCollege of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-7891
Claire F VerschraegenComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-3089
Merry Jennifer MarkhamCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-3567-3494
Steven AlbertsMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-4122
John SweetenhamUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Kendra CameronAssociation of American Cancer Institutes, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-8204-5928
Taher Abu HejlehHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 21st Century Cures Act mandates the immediate release of clinical information (IRCI) to patients. Immediate sharing of sensitive test results to patients with cancer might have serious unintended consequences for patients and providers.

methodsA 22-question REDCap survey was designed by the Association of American Cancer Institutes Physician Clinical Leadership Initiative Steering Committee to explore oncology providers' opinions on IRCI policy implementation. It was administered twice in 2021 with a 3-month interval. A third survey with a single question seeking providers' opinions about their adaptation to the IRCI mandate was administered 1 year later to those who had responded to the earlier surveys. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. The survey was sent to all Association of American Cancer Institutes cancer center members. In the first or second administration, 167 practitioners answered the survey; 31 responded to the third survey.

resultsThree quarters of the providers did not favor the new requirement for IRCI and 62% encountered questions from patients about results being sent to them without provider interpretation. Only half of the hospitals had a plan in place to deal with the new IRCI requirements. A third survey, for longitudinal follow-up, indicated a more favorable trend toward adoption of IRCI.

conclusionIRCI for patients with cancer was perceived negatively by academic oncology providers after its implementation. It was viewed to be associated with higher levels of patient anxiety and complaints about the care delivered. Providers preferred to discuss test results with patients before release.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatientsDelivery of Health CareHumansMedical OncologySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36780583
PMCPMC10414766
OpenAlexW4320482516

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.