Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781957›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2023

The evolving role of investigative toxicology in the pharmaceutical industry.

Francois Pognan, Mario Beilmann, Harrie C M Boonen, Andreas Czich, Gordon Dear, Philip Hewitt, Tomas Mow, Teija Oinonen, Adrian Roth, Thomas Steger-Hartmann and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Analyzing Molecular Determinants of Nanodrugs' Cytotoxic Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. A targeted lipidomics workflow for high-throughput phenotyping and mechanism-based in vitro hepatotoxicity studies.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Discovery of novel anti-RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Francois PognanDiscovery and Investigative Safety, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. francois.pognan@novartis.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-2033
Mario BeilmannNonclinical Drug Safety Germany, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Harrie C M BoonenDrug Safety, Dept of Exploratory Toxicology, Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Andreas CzichR&D Preclinical Safety, Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gordon DearIn Vitro In Vivo Translation, GlaxoSmithKline David Jack Centre for Research, Ware, UK.
Philip HewittChemical and Preclinical Safety, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Tomas MowSafety Pharmacology and Early Toxicology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark.
Teija OinonenPreclinical Safety, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
Adrian RothPharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas Steger-HartmannInvestigational Toxicology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Jean-Pierre ValentinNon-Clinical Safety Evaluation, UCB Biopharma SRL, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-9155
Freddy Van GoethemPredictive, Investigative & Translational Toxicology, Nonclinical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Richard J WeaverInnovation Life Cycle Management, Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-6030
Peter NewhamClinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, AstraZeneca R&D, Cambridge, UK. peter.newham@astrazeneca.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-4080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, preclinical toxicology was essentially a descriptive discipline in which treatment-related effects were carefully reported and used as a basis to calculate safety margins for drug candidates. In recent years, however, technological advances have increasingly enabled researchers to gain insights into toxicity mechanisms, supporting greater understanding of species relevance and translatability to humans, prediction of safety events, mitigation of side effects and development of safety biomarkers. Consequently, investigative (or mechanistic) toxicology has been gaining momentum and is now a key capability in the pharmaceutical industry. Here, we provide an overview of the current status of the field using case studies and discuss the potential impact of ongoing technological developments, based on a survey of investigative toxicologists from 14 European-based medium-sized to large pharmaceutical companies.

Indexed as

Drug IndustryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsBiomarkersDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansTechnologyBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36781957
PMCPMC9924869

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.