Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781982›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2023

Protein degraders enter the clinic - a new approach to cancer therapy.

Deborah Chirnomas, Keith R Hornberger, Craig M Crews

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 269 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
269citing papers in PubMed
85.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

269 citing papers in PubMed, 558 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Relative Bioavailability Study of Vepdegestrant Tablets in Healthy Adult Participants.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Identification of novel HIF2α inhibitors: a structure-based virtual screening approach.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Generalizable Strategies for the Synthesis of Cereblon-Recruiting PROTAC Prodrugs.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Phase Ib Trial of Bavdegalutamide (ARV-110) in Combination with Abiraterone for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah ChirnomasArvinas Operations, Inc., New Haven, CT, USA. debbie.chirnomas@arvinas.com.
Keith R HornbergerArvinas Operations, Inc., New Haven, CT, USA. keith.hornberger@arvinas.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6127-2814
Craig M CrewsDepartment of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. craig.crews@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8456-2005
Arvinas (United States) · USYale University · US

Funding

Inducing Proximity: An Emerging Paradigm for New Therapeutic ModalitiesR35CA197589 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CRAIG M CREWS · 2015 to 2026
$10.7M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterobifunctional protein degraders, such as PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) protein degraders, constitute a novel therapeutic modality that harnesses the cell's natural protein-degradation machinery - that is, the ubiquitin-proteasome system - to selectively target proteins involved in disease pathogenesis for elimination. Protein degraders have several potential advantages over small-molecule inhibitors that have traditionally been used for cancer treatment, including their event-driven (rather than occupancy-driven) pharmacology, which permits sub-stoichiometric drug concentrations for activity, their capacity to act iteratively and target multiple copies of a protein of interest, and their potential to target nonenzymatic proteins that were previously considered 'undruggable'. Following numerous innovations in protein degrader design and rigorous evaluation in preclinical models, protein degraders entered clinical testing in 2019. Currently, 18 protein degraders are in phase I or phase I/II clinical trials that involve patients with various tumour types, with a phase III trial of one initiated in 2022. The first safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic data from these studies are now materializing and, although considerably more evidence is needed, protein degraders are showing promising activity as cancer therapies. Herein, we review advances in protein degrader development, the preclinical research that supported their entry into clinical studies, the available data for protein degraders in patients and future directions for this new class of drugs.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansProteinsProteolysisProteins

Identifiers

PMID36781982
PMCPMC11698446
OpenAlexW4320480893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.