ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1987
Relationships between body dimensions and resting and working oxygen consumption in boys aged 11 to 18 years.
Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of peak oxygen uptake from 11-16 years determined using both treadmill and cycle ergometry.European journal of applied physiology · 2019Article
- Development of Aerobic Fitness in Young Team Sport Athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015Review
- Oxygen uptake during running as related to body mass in circumpubertal boys: a longitudinal study.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1992Article
- Effects of sport (football) on growth: auxological, anthropometric and hormonal aspects.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1990Article
- The influence of training on physical and functional growth before, during and after puberty.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1987Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationships between VO2 at rest, VO2max and VO2 during submaximal work on a treadmill with body weight, height and lean body mass assessed by densitometry were analyzed annually in 39 boys aged 11 to 18 years. Interindividual differences in VO2 at rest and VO2max during growth depended in the first place on interindividual differences in lean body mass, to a lesser extent on differences in body weight and least on differences in height. Intersubject differences in VO2 during submaximal work were primarily conditioned by differences in body weight, due to the fact that, at a given running speed, energy output depends on body weight. The differences in submaximal VO2 depended to a lesser extent on differences in lean body mass and least on differences in height. The relationships between VO2 increments and increases in body dimensions were somewhat different in 90 boys between the ages of 11 and 15 years: VO2max increments were determined primarily by changes in body weight and height, changes in lean body mass being of secondary importance. Increases in submaximal VO2 were influenced decisively by increments in body weight, followed by increments in lean body mass and least by increments in height. In the equation y = a.xb expressing the relationship of VO2max to body weight and height, the values of b at the ages of 14 and 15 years were 0.87 and 0.88 in relation to body weight, 2.63 and 2.72 in relation to height. These values are significantly higher than the theoretical values of 0.67 for body weight and 2.00 for height. Similar significant differences from these theoretical values were found for all values between the ages of 11 and 15 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.