Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787273›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

Longitudinal study of wound healing status and bacterial colonisation of Staphylococcus aureus and Corynebacterium diphtheriae in epidermolysis bullosa patients.

Ignacia Fuentes, María Joao Yubero, Pilar Morandé, Carmen Varela, Karen Oróstica, Francisco Acevedo, Boris Rebolledo-Jaramillo, Esteban Arancibia, Lorena Porte, Francis Palisson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ignacia FuentesDEBRA Chile, Santiago, Chile.
María Joao YuberoDEBRA Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pilar MorandéDEBRA Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Carmen VarelaLaboratorio Clínico, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
Karen OrósticaInstituto de Investigación Interdisciplinaria, Vicerrectoría Académica, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Francisco AcevedoDepartment of Hematology Oncology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Boris Rebolledo-JaramilloCentro de Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Esteban ArancibiaDEBRA Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Lorena PorteLaboratorio Clínico, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Francis PalissonDEBRA Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Universidad del Desarrollo · CLClínica Alemana · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversity of Talca · CL

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientfico, Tecnolgico y de Innovacin Tecnolgica 1181093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is an inherited disorder characterised by skin fragility and the appearance of blisters and wounds. Patient wounds are often colonised or infected with bacteria, leading to impaired healing, pain and high risk of death by sepsis. Little is known about the impact of bacterial composition and susceptibility in wound resolution, and there is a need for longitudinal studies to understand healing outcomes with different types of bacterial colonisation. A prospective longitudinal study of 70 wounds from 15 severe EB patients (Junctional and Recessive Dystrophic EB) from Chile. Wounds were selected independently of their infected status. Wound cultures, including bacterial species identification, composition and Staphylococcus aureus (SA) antibiotic susceptibility were registered. Wounds were separated into categories according to their healing capacity, recognising chronic, and healing wounds. Hundred-one of the 102 wound cultures were positive for bacterial growth. From these, 100 were SA-positive; 31 were resistant to Ciprofloxacin (31%) and only seven were methicillin-resistant SA (7%). Ciprofloxacin-resistant SA was found significantly predominant in chronic wounds (**P < .01). Interestingly, atoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae (CD) was identified and found to be the second most abundant recovered bacteria (31/101), present almost always in combination with SA (30/31). CD was only found in Recessive Dystrophic EB patients and not related to wound chronicity. Other less frequent bacterial species found included Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococus spp. and Proteus spp. Infection was negatively associated with the healing status of wounds.

Indexed as

Corynebacterium diphtheriaeEpidermolysis BullosaEpidermolysis Bullosa DystrophicaStaphylococcal InfectionsCiprofloxacinHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesStaphylococcus aureusWound HealingCiprofloxacinCorynebacterium diphtheriaeepidermolysis bullosaskin diseasesStaphylococcus aureuswound healing

Identifiers

PMID36787273
PMCPMC9927916
OpenAlexW4291003503

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.