Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788564›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2023

Leveraging massively parallel reporter assays for evolutionary questions.

Irene Gallego Romero, Amanda J Lea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. PoolParty: streamlined design of DNA sequence libraries in Python.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mastering genetics for your clinic: A step-by-step guide.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irene Gallego Romero *Melbourne Integrative Genomics, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia. irene.gallego@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1613-8998
Amanda J Lea *Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA. amanda.j.lea@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Early life environmental effects: molecular mechanisms and inter-individual variationR35GM147267 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda Lea · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-standing goal of evolutionary biology is to decode how gene regulation contributes to organismal diversity. Doing so is challenging because it is hard to predict function from non-coding sequence and to perform molecular research with non-model taxa. Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) enable the testing of thousands to millions of sequences for regulatory activity simultaneously. Here, we discuss the execution, advantages, and limitations of MPRAs, with a focus on evolutionary questions. We propose solutions for extending MPRAs to rare taxa and those with limited genomic resources, and we underscore MPRA's broad potential for driving genome-scale, functional studies across organisms.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenomicsGenes, ReporterSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID36788564
PMCPMC9926830

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.